Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36017949›Full record

ReviewSexual and reproductive health matters2021

Medical abortion through telehealth in India: a critical perspective.

Dipika Jain, Anubha Rastogi, Kavya Kartik, Anmol Diwan, Oieshi Saha

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dipika JainProfessor of Law & Director, Centre for Justice, Law and Society, Jindal Global Law School, New Delhi, India. Correspondence: djain@jgu.edu.in.
Anubha RastogiIndependent Advocate, Bombay High Court, Bombay, India.
Kavya KartikFormer Assistant Director, Centre for Justice, Law and Society, Jindal Global Law School, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9189-6698
Anmol DiwanAssistant Professor, Senior Research Associate, Centre for Justice, Law and Society, Jindal Global Law School, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5605-9357
Oieshi SahaAssistant Professor, Former Research Associate, Centre for Justice, Law and Society, Jindal Global Law School, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and nationwide lockdowns have significantly impacted access to abortions for millions of people in India. One of the proposed solutions to address the inaccessibility of abortion services is the use of teleconsultation or "telemedicine" where pregnant persons consult with Registered Medical Practitioners (RMPs) over voice or video calls. The RMPs then prescribe the necessary medication electronically. However, telehealth services bring their own set of social and legal challenges. Although they can allow for greater access to medical abortions, especially in situations where pregnant persons are unable to opt for in-person medical care, it is important to note that telemedicine is not a one-stop solution for lack of access to timely, affordable abortions. This is particularly due to the structural barriers of caste, class, religion, gender, and disability that impede access to healthcare services. In this article, we examine the need for telehealth services in India as a means of increasing access to medical abortion services and the structural barriers that prevent it from being an effective and equitable solution for all.

Indexed as

abortionhealthcarereproductive rightstelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36017949
PMCPMC9423857
OpenAlexW4293179161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.