Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36017772›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2022

Clinically meaningful change for the chair stand test: monitoring mobility in integrated care for older people.

Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista, Philipe de Souto Barreto, Aaron Salinas-Rodriguez, Betty Manrique-Espinoza, Yves Rolland, Sandrine Andrieu, Bruno Vellas, MAPT/DSA group

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The relationship between physical activity, sedentary time, and cognitive function following bariatric surgery.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cross-sectional associations between patterns and composition of upright and stepping events with physical function: insights from The Maastricht Study.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emmanuel Gonzalez-BautistaGérontopole of Toulouse, Institute of Aging, Toulouse University Hospital (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9844-3034
Philipe de Souto BarretoGérontopole of Toulouse, Institute of Aging, Toulouse University Hospital (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France.
Aaron Salinas-RodriguezCenter for Surveys and Evaluation Research, National Institute of Public Health (INSP) Mexico, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Betty Manrique-EspinozaCenter for Surveys and Evaluation Research, National Institute of Public Health (INSP) Mexico, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Yves RollandGérontopole of Toulouse, Institute of Aging, Toulouse University Hospital (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France.
Sandrine AndrieuGérontopole of Toulouse, Institute of Aging, Toulouse University Hospital (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France.
Bruno VellasGérontopole of Toulouse, Institute of Aging, Toulouse University Hospital (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France.
MAPT/DSA group

Funding

Avid Radiopharmaceuticals IncEuropean Regional Development FundExonHit Therapeutics SAGérontopôle of Toulouse, the French Ministry of HealthPierre Fabre Research InstituteRegion Occitanie/Pyrénées-Méditerranéethe Programme des Investissements d'Avenir
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinically meaningful changes in the five-repetition chair stand test are essential for monitoring mobility in integrated care for older people. Recommendations for the clinically meaningful change of the chair stand test are not well known. Our study aimed to estimate the absolute and relative clinically meaningful changes for older adults' five-repetition chair stand test.

methodsWe applied distribution-based and anchor-based methods in addition to receiver operator characteristics analyses to a population-based study of community-dwelling adults (SAGE Mexico study, n = 897) to derive the clinically meaningful change in the chair stand test. We used three self-reported clinical anchors: moving around, vigorous activities, and walking 1 km. Our primary outcome was the incidence of disability for basic activities of daily living (ADL). Secondly, we examined our estimates of clinically meaningful change in a clinical trial population of healthy volunteers (MAPT, France, study n = 1575) concerning the risk of incident ADL disability.

resultsThe age of SAGE Mexico participants ranged from 60 to 96 years; mean (SD) = 69.0 (6.2); 54.4% were female. Their baseline chair stand time averaged 12.1 s (SD = 3 s). Forty-eight participants (5.6%) showed incident disability over 3 years. The absolute and relative clinically meaningful change cut points found over 3 years of follow-up were 2.6 s and 27.7%, respectively. Absolute clinically meaningful change ranged from 0.5 to 4.7 s, depending on the estimation method. Relative clinically meaningful change ranged from 9.6 to 46.2%. SAGE Mexico participants with absolute and relative clinically meaningful declines (increasing 2.6 s and 27.7% from baseline time, respectively) showed an increased risk of ADL disability [aRR = 1.93; P = 0.0381; 95% CI (1.05, 3.46) and aRR = 2.27; P = 0.0157; 95% CI (1.22, 4.10)], respectively, compared with those without a clinically meaningful decline. MAPT participants [age range = 70-94; mean (SD) = 75.3 (4.4); 64.8% female; incident ADL disability over 5 years = 145(14.8%)] with a relative clinically meaningful decline (≥27.7% from baseline over 3 years) had a 74% higher risk of incident ADL disability than their counterparts [aHR = 1.74; P = 0.016; CI95% (1.11, 2.72); mean follow-up of 58 months].

conclusionsCommunity-dwelling older adults with an increase of 3 s or 28% in chair stand test performance over 3 years (approximately 1 s or 10% per year) could be the target of interventions to enhance mobility and prevent incident disability.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedExercise TestPersons with DisabilitiesActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMaleMiddle AgedWalkingClinically meaningful changeFive-repetition chair stand testOlder adultsPhysical functional performance

Identifiers

PMID36017772
PMCPMC9530589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.