Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36017668›Full record

ArticleJournal of integrative bioinformatics2022

Evaluating molecular representations in machine learning models for drug response prediction and interpretability.

Delora Baptista, João Correia, Bruno Pereira, Miguel Rocha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of integrative bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Representation of Molecules by Sequences of Instructions.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The physics-AI dialogue in drug design.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Interpretable molecular encodings and representations for machine learning tasks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Delora BaptistaCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus of Gualtar, Braga, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9258-5303
João CorreiaCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus of Gualtar, Braga, Portugal.
Bruno PereiraCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus of Gualtar, Braga, Portugal.
Miguel RochaCentre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus of Gualtar, Braga, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-8172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to guide drug discovery processes. When applying ML approaches to chemical datasets, molecular descriptors and fingerprints are typically used to represent compounds as numerical vectors. However, in recent years, end-to-end deep learning (DL) methods that can learn feature representations directly from line notations or molecular graphs have been proposed as alternatives to using precomputed features. This study set out to investigate which compound representation methods are the most suitable for drug sensitivity prediction in cancer cell lines. Twelve different representations were benchmarked on 5 compound screening datasets, using DeepMol, a new chemoinformatics package developed by our research group, to perform these analyses. The results of this study show that the predictive performance of end-to-end DL models is comparable to, and at times surpasses, that of models trained on molecular fingerprints, even when less training data is available. This study also found that combining several compound representation methods into an ensemble can improve performance. Finally, we show that a

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryMachine Learningcancerdeep learningdrug sensitivitylearned representationsmolecular fingerprints

Identifiers

PMID36017668
PMCPMC9521826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.