Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36017469›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in allergy2022

The MaDo real-life study of dose adjustment of allergen immunotherapy liquid formulations in an indication of respiratory allergic disease: Reasons, practices, and outcomes.

Marguerite Thétis-Soulié, Maxime Hosotte, Isabelle Grozelier, Claire Baillez, Silvia Scurati, Valérie Mercier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marguerite Thétis-SouliéPrivate Office, Créteil, France.
Maxime HosotteCentre d'Allergologie de Gentilly, Nancy, France.
Isabelle GrozelierPrivate Office, Cholet, France.
Claire BaillezPrivate Office, Perpignan, France.
Silvia ScuratiGlobal Medical Affairs Department, Stallergenes Greer, Antony, France.
Valérie MercierPrivate Office, Toulouse, France.
Centre Hospitalier de Perpignan · FRStallergenes Greer (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) is a safe, effective, disease-modifying treatment for moderate-to-severe respiratory allergies. The function and responsiveness of the immune system components underlying the effects of allergen immunotherapy may vary from one patient to another. Furthermore, the severity of the symptoms of allergic disease can fluctuate over time, due to changes in environmental allergen exposure, effector cell responsiveness, and cell signaling. Hence, the allergen dose provided through SLIT can be fine-tuned to establish an optimal balance between effectiveness and tolerability. The objective of the MaDo study was to describe and understand dose adjustments of SLIT liquid formulations in France. We performed a retrospective, observational, cross-sectional, real-life study of allergists and other specialist physicians. Physicians described their patients

Indexed as

allergen immunotherapyallergic rhinitisdose adjustmentpatients profilingprecision dosingprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID36017469
PMCPMC9395981
OpenAlexW4292357499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.