Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36017375›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2021

Qualitative analysis of first-person accounts of noetic experiences.

Helané Wahbeh, Nina Fry, Paolo Speirn, Lutvija Hrnjic, Emma Ancel, Erica Niebauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helané WahbehResearch, Institute of Noetic Sciences, Petaluma, CA, 94928, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3650-4633
Nina FryResearch, Institute of Noetic Sciences, Petaluma, CA, 94928, USA.
Paolo SpeirnResearch, Institute of Noetic Sciences, Petaluma, CA, 94928, USA.
Lutvija HrnjicResearch, Institute of Noetic Sciences, Petaluma, CA, 94928, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2312-0705
Emma AncelResearch, Institute of Noetic Sciences, Petaluma, CA, 94928, USA.
Erica NiebauerResearch, Institute of Noetic Sciences, Petaluma, CA, 94928, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term "noetic" comes from the Greek word noēsis/noētikos that means inner wisdom, direct knowing, intuition, or implicit understanding. Strong cultural taboos exist about sharing these experiences. Thus, many may not feel comfortable transparently discussing or researching these topics, despite growing evidence that these experiences may be real. The study's objective was to qualitatively evaluate first-hand accounts of noetic experiences. 521 English-speaking adults from around the world completed an online survey that collected demographic data and four open-ended questions about noetic experiences. Thematic analysis was used to characterize the data. The ten most used codes were expressing to or sharing with others, impacting decision-making, intuition/"just knowing," meditation/hypnosis, inner visions, setting intentions/getting into the "state," healing others, writing for self, and inner voice. There were five main themes identified: 1. Ways of Engagement; 2. Ways of Knowing; 3. Types of Information; 4. Ways of Affecting; and 5. Ways of Expressing. Subthemes. Future research will include investigating the nuances of these themes and also establishing standardized methods for evaluating them. This would also then inform curricula and therapies to support people in these experiences.

Indexed as

CognitionIntentionAdultHumansintuitionnoeticnoetic experiencesparapsychologypsychologyqualitativesubjective

Identifiers

PMID36017375
PMCPMC9364752.3

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.