ArticleCureus2022
COVID-19 and Genitourinary Tract: A Retrospective Study in the Tertiary Care Center.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unveiling the genitourinary phenotype of long COVID: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction COVID-19 pandemic has spread across the globe in the last two years and COVID-19 pneumonia is its typical presentation. Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has the potential to affect extrapulmonary sites like the involvement of the urinary tract and male genital organs. Objectives This single institutional retrospective observational study aimed to study the effects of COVID-19 on the lower urinary tract (LUT) and male genital system. Methods COVID-19 effect on the genitourinary tract was studied in a retrospective observational setting in a tertiary care setting from March 2020 to December 2021 consisting of 110 patients. After informed consent from patients, retrospective data collection was included in a repository. Presenting features related to the genitourinary tract were noted and basic biochemical profiles like CBC, RFT, LFT, urine analysis, and urine culture for bacterial sensitivity were performed in all the patients affected by COVID-19. High-resolution ultrasound was sparingly used according to the clinical presentation of these COVID-19 patients. Results A total of 110 patients 95 males and 15 females were included in this study. De novo LUT symptoms were present in 10 (9.09%) patients and acute worsening of these was seen in three patients. Scrotal discomfort was the most common symptom among men found in five (5.26%) patients and frequency of urine was the overall most common symptom found in 13 (12.38%) patients also having two female patients. Among biochemical findings, microscopic hematuria in 68 (61.81%), pyuria in 72 (65.45%), and raised blood urea were observed in 41 (37.27%) patients with COVID-19. Ultrasound findings revealed acute epididymal-orchitis in 3 (3.15 %) and acute orchitis/epididymitis in one (1.05%) case, respectively. Conclusions COVID-19 patients do have the chance of developing the involvement of the urinary tract and male genital system and the clinicians should be aware of this so that they can manage these patients accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.