Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36017233›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Nursing Staff Mortality During the Covid-19 Pandemic, Scoping Review.

Yuliana Vera-Alanis, Daysi Aranda-Sanchez, Guillermo Cano-Verdugo, Pedro Gonzalez-Angulo, Cynthia Berenice Rueda-Sanchez, Augusto Rojas-Martinez

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuliana Vera-AlanisFacultad de Enfermeria, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8523-2630
Daysi Aranda-SanchezFacultad de Enfermeria, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico.
Guillermo Cano-VerdugoFacultad de Enfermeria, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4905-1939
Pedro Gonzalez-AnguloFacultad de Enfermeria, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico.
Cynthia Berenice Rueda-SanchezFacultad de Enfermeria, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico.
Augusto Rojas-MartinezFacultad de Enfermeria, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Monterrey, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3765-6778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In a pandemic, the risk of infection and mortality for nurses can increase substantially. This study analyzes the information reported on the mortality of nursing personnel from different countries due to COVID-19. Methods: We performed a scoping review by searching information available in PubMed, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases using concepts related to nursing, mortality, COVID-19, etc. The studies were searched from September 1 to October 30, 2021. This review included 12 articles were selected among 73 identified for the scope search because they included nurses. Results: Nursing personnel presented a high mortality rate after physicians and health personnel. The average age of the deceased nurses was 43 years, being higher in men than in women. Higher mortality rates were reported in services attending COVID-19, nursing homes, and psychiatric centers. Conclusion: Contagion and deaths are attributed to lack of planning and inadequate personal protective equipment.

Indexed as

COVID-19mortalitynursing staffoccupational risk

Identifiers

PMID36017233
PMCPMC9397378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.