ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics2021
Phase I clinical trials in adoptive T-cell therapies.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose-finding designs for cell therapy cancer clinical trials evaluating drug-combinations.Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
- Dose-finding based on feasibility and late-onset toxicity in adoptive cell therapy trials.Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics · 2024Article
- Impact of dose feasibility on the conduct of phase I trials of adoptive cell therapy.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We develop three approaches to phase I dose finding designs for engineered T cells in oncology. Our goal is to address a very particular difficulty in this clinical setting: an inability to fully administer the dose allocated to some patients. Current designs can be biased as a result of this incomplete information being ignored or discarded from the analysis. The performance of the three proposed solutions is largely similar, and all offer an advantage over the currently used design. One of the three methods is supported by theoretical study, and we provide some new results on this approach.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.