ArticleClinical and translational allergy2022
Characterization, epidemiology and risk factors of multiple drug allergy syndrome and multiple drug intolerance syndrome: A systematic review.
Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility of Patch Testing, LTT, and HLA Genotyping in Identifying Culprit Drugs and Diagnosing Multiple Drug Hypersensitivity in Definite DRESS: A 10-Year Cohort Study.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Article
- Antipsychotics-Associated Allergic Reaction: A Case Report and Review of Literature.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026Article
- Multiple Drug Intolerance Syndrome and Arterial Hypertension-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Immediate Hypersensitivity Reaction to Pheniramine in a Case of Multiple Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome.Cureus · 2025Article
- Risk factors, clinical presentations, and common culprits in drug allergies: a case-control study from Türkiye.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2025Article
- Is the Anamnesis Enough to De-Label Patients with Reported Beta-Lactam Allergy?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Narrative review of recent developments and the future of penicillin allergy de-labelling by non-allergists.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2024Review
- Delabelling multiple antibiotic allergy: Practical issues.Frontiers in allergy · 2023Review
- Characterization, epidemiology and risk factors of multiple drug allergy syndrome and multiple drug intolerance syndrome: A systematic review.Clinical and translational allergy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple drug allergy and multiple drug intolerance syndrome (MDAS/MDIS) labels are an impediment to clinical care and knowledge regarding these conditions is limited. This systematic review investigated the characterization, epidemiology, risk factors, clinical impact and pharmaco-economics of MDAS and MDIS. Methods: Systematic literature search across 11 databases (01 January 2000-06 November 2020) for MDIS, MDAS and related terminology. Studies were reviewed for quality of evidence and risk of bias by employing Critical Appraisal Skills Programme cohort study checklist. A narrative synthesis approach facilitated by systematic textual descriptions, tabulation and thematic analysis was adopted. Results: There was heterogeneity in terminology and methodology. Few studies applied standard drug allergy diagnostic methods. There is some evidence to suggest that multiple drug hypersensitivity syndrome (MDHS; i.e., confirmed allergies in MDAS) is a distinct clinical entity. Prevalence of MDIS and MDAS labels in unselected & selected populations varied between 2.1%-6.4% & 4.9%-90% and 1.2% & 0%-36% respectively. Reported risk factors included female gender, increasing age, body mass index, anxiety, depression, co-morbidities, concurrent allergies and increased healthcare utilization. Drugs commonly implicated were antibiotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. No studies relating to clinical impact and pharmaco-economics were found. Conclusion: There is considerable burden of MDAS and MDIS labels. Data needs cautious interpretation as majority of studies described involved unverified labels. Despite this limitation and heterogeneity of studies, there is some evidence to suggest that MDHS is a distinct clinical entity. Well-designed multi-centre studies applying standardized terminology and diagnostic methodology are needed to gain further insight into these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.