Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36017171›Full record

ArticleBJR open2022

Frequency and intensity of [

Alexander Maurer, Helen Schiesser, Stephan Skawran, Antonio G Gennari, Manuel Dittli, Irene A Burger, Cäcilia Mader, Christoph Berger, Daniel Eberli, Martin W Huellner and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJR open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander Maurer
Helen Schiesser
Stephan Skawran
Antonio G Gennari
Manuel Dittli
Irene A Burger
Cäcilia Mader
Christoph Berger
Daniel Eberli
Martin W Huellner
Michael Messerli
University of Zurich · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the frequency and intensity of [ Methods: 126 patients undergoing [ Results: There was a significant difference in maximum standardized uptake value in ipsilateral and compared to contralateral axillary lymph nodes in the vaccination group ( Conclusion: Our data suggest mildly increased [ Advances in knowledge: No specific preparations or precautions (

Identifiers

PMID36017171
PMCPMC9364367
OpenAlexW4205816652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.