Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36017157›Full record

ArticleRemote sensing2022

Prototyping Crop Traits Retrieval Models for CHIME: Dimensionality Reduction Strategies Applied to PRISMA Data.

Ana B Pascual-Venteo, Enrique Portalés, Katja Berger, Giulia Tagliabue, Jose L Garcia, Adrián Pérez-Suay, Juan Pablo Rivera-Caicedo, Jochem Verrelst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Remote sensing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Retrieval of carbon content and biomass from hyperspectral imagery over cultivated areas.ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing : official publication of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana B Pascual-VenteoImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltran 2, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9303-4557
Enrique PortalésImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltran 2, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Katja BergerImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltran 2, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0784-7717
Giulia TagliabueRemote Sensing of Environmental Dynamics Laboratory (LTDA), University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126 Milano, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9725-9956
Jose L GarciaImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltran 2, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.
Adrián Pérez-SuayImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltran 2, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8258-4454
Juan Pablo Rivera-CaicedoSecretary of Research and Graduate Studies, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Tepic 63155, Nayarit, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3188-1448
Jochem VerrelstImage Processing Laboratory (IPL), University of Valencia, C/Catedrático José Beltran 2, 46980 Paterna, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-2081

Funding

European Research Council 755617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In preparation for new-generation imaging spectrometer missions and the accompanying unprecedented inflow of hyperspectral data, optimized models are needed to generate vegetation traits routinely. Hybrid models, combining radiative transfer models with machine learning algorithms, are preferred, however, dealing with spectral collinearity imposes an additional challenge. In this study, we analyzed two spectral dimensionality reduction methods: principal component analysis (PCA) and band ranking (BR), embedded in a hybrid workflow for the retrieval of specific leaf area (SLA), leaf area index (LAI), canopy water content (CWC), canopy chlorophyll content (CCC), the fraction of absorbed photosynthetic active radiation (FAPAR), and fractional vegetation cover (FVC). The SCOPE model was used to simulate training data sets, which were optimized with active learning. Gaussian process regression (GPR) algorithms were trained over the simulations to obtain trait-specific models. The inclusion of PCA and BR with 20 features led to the so-called GPR-20PCA and GPR-20BR models. The 20PCA models encompassed over 99.95% cumulative variance of the full spectral data, while the GPR-20BR models were based on the 20 most sensitive bands. Validation against in situ data obtained moderate to optimal results with normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) from 13.9% (CWC) to 22.3% (CCC) for GPR-20PCA models, and NRMSE from 19.6% (CWC) to 29.1% (SLA) for GPR-20BR models. Overall, the GPR-20PCA slightly outperformed the GPR-20BR models for all six variables. To demonstrate mapping capabilities, both models were tested on a PRecursore IperSpettrale della Missione Applicativa (PRISMA) scene, spectrally resampled to Copernicus Hyperspectral Imaging Mission for the Environment (CHIME), over an agricultural test site (Jolanda di Savoia, Italy). The two strategies obtained plausible spatial patterns, and consistency between the two models was highest for FVC and LAI (

Indexed as

active learningbiochemical and biophysical traitsCHIMEfeature selectionGaussian process regressionhybrid methodsprincipal component analysisPRISMA

Identifiers

PMID36017157
PMCPMC7613375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.