Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36017118›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2022

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Findings in Primary Open-Angle and Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma.

Emrah Düzova, Gülizar Demirok, Güner Üney, Ahmet Kaderli, Mehmet Yakın, Selma Özbek-Uzman, Ümit Ekşioğlu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emrah DüzovaUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2393-0919
Gülizar DemirokUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-4669
Güner ÜneyUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8503-4258
Ahmet KaderliMuğla Sıtkı Koçman University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Muğla, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4725-1515
Mehmet YakınUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3470-4124
Selma Özbek-UzmanUniversity of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4967-7325
Ümit EkşioğluBaşkent University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3061-7162
Ministry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the optical disc and macular vascular density values of patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals by using optical coherence tomography angiography and evaluate the relationship between structural and functional test results and vascular density. Materials and Methods: The study included 128 eyes in total: 31 with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEG), 55 with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and similar visual field defects, and 42 healthy eyes. Whole image peripapillary vessel density (wpVD), intradisc vessel density (idVD), peripapillary vessel density (pVD), whole image macular vessel density (wmVD), and parafoveal vessel density (pfVD) values were compared between the groups. Correlations between visual field findings, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and optic nerve head measurements and peripapillary and macular vascular density were analyzed. Results: In the PEG and POAG groups, wpVD, idVD, wmVD, and pfVD values were significantly lower in than the control group. In the PEG group, wpVD was found to be significantly lower than the POAG group (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between the PEG and POAG groups in wmVD and pfVD except for nasal pfVD. There were strong positive correlations between RNFL thickness and pVD in the glaucoma groups (p<0.001). Significant correlations were found between visual field mean deviation and pattern standard deviation values and peripapillary and macular vessel density values in the glaucoma groups. Conclusion: Vascular density values were lower in glaucoma patients compared to normal individuals, and there is a strong correlation between structural and functional tests and vessel density values. The lower vascular density in the PEG group compared to the POAG group indicates that vascular damage may be more common in PEG patients.

Indexed as

Exfoliation SyndromeGlaucomaGlaucoma, Open-AngleAngiographyHumansRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical CoherenceOptical coherence tomography angiographypseudoexfoliation glaucomavessel density, primary open-angle glaucomavisual field

Identifiers

PMID36017118
PMCPMC9421929
OpenAlexW4293088386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.