Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36017110›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of occupational therapy2022

Exploring the Research Priorities for Occupational Therapy in India: A Descriptive Review.

Sureshkumar Kamalakannan, Lakshmanan Sethuraman, Manigandan Chockalingam, Selvaraj Samuelkamaleshkumar, Shobana Devi Moorthy, MuraliKrishnan Srinivasan, Jothikumar Ramakrishnan, Thirumugam Muthuvel, Karthik Mani

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of occupational therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Quality of Occupational Therapy Research in India - A Descriptive Review.The Indian journal of occupational therapy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Sureshkumar KamalakannanDepartment of Social Work, Education, and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England, United Kingdom.
Lakshmanan SethuramanCentre for Addiction Medicine, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, Departments of Occupational Therapy.
Manigandan ChockalingamDepartment of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland, Galway.
Selvaraj SamuelkamaleshkumarChristian Medical College, Vellore.
Shobana Devi MoorthySmart Sensory Kids.
MuraliKrishnan SrinivasanMeenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research.
Jothikumar RamakrishnanHealth Services Executives, Limerick, Ireland.
Thirumugam MuthuvelRehabilitation Research Consultancy, Karaikal, Tamil Nadu, India.
Karthik ManiDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Texas Medical Branch, Texas, USA.
Christian Medical College & Hospital · INHealth Service Executive · IEInstitute of Public Health · INMeenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research · INNational Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · INOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/CPHE/16/1/502650Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Occupational therapists are considered an important workforce for the rehabilitation of persons with disabilities globally. However, in India, the profession is just beginning to gain recognition within the national and state-level systems for health care. One of the reasons for this could be the paucity of specific research related to the development of occupational therapy (OT) and its benefits to the health systems. Therefore, it is of immense public health importance to explore the priorities and gaps in OT research in India. A vast majority of the OT research in India is promoted and disseminated through the All-India Occupational Therapists Association (AIOTA) and its annual national conference (ANC). Objectives: The objective of this study is to descriptively review the conference abstracts of the AIOTA ANC published in the Study Design: The study design was a descriptive, nonsystematic review. Methods: Review of the abstracts selected for the AIOTA ANC published in the IJOT from 2017 to 2021. A data extraction form was developed and used to synthesize data related to the clinical and demographic characteristics of OT research in India. Results: The search yielded 218 abstracts. State-level trends indicated that close to 85% of the research submissions were from four states and no submissions from the northeastern states until 2020. Nearly 60% of the abstracts were clinical research with OT interventions. About 40% of these research abstracts were related to pediatrics, followed by neurology (17%), musculoskeletal (15%), mental health (10%), and ergonomics and assistive technology (8%). There were 1%-2% of research abstracts submitted related to coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and geriatrics. About 85% of the research abstracts were related to impairment (39%), activity limitation (26%), and social participation (22%). Conclusion: This review highlights the need for diversifying the research in OT in India. This is particularly important in relation to expanding from selected states to pan-India research and development, especially in the northeastern states. Furthermore, the focus of OT research must move beyond impairments and approach disability from the biopsychosocial perspective. It is also very important to diversify the research in OT to areas that are of public health importance such as COVID-19, geriatrics, noncommunicable diseases, and rehabilitation in health systems. Priority setting for research in OT in India is an important implication of this review.

Indexed as

DisabilityHealth SystemsOccupational TherapyRehabilitationResearch

Identifiers

PMID36017110
PMCPMC7613406
OpenAlexW4289825345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.