ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Intravascular imaging in coronary stent restenosis: Prevention, characterization, and management.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and feasibility of rotational atherectomy in chronic total occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Study on the potential clinical significance of subclinical stent edge effects after drug-eluting stent implantation.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Practical Management in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of IVUS Guidance on Clinical and Procedural Outcomes in Intracoronary Brachytherapy.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness and outcomes of physiology- and imaging-guided PCI: an evidence synthesis and network meta-analysis of FFR, iFR, OCT, and IVUS.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Critical Appraisal of Evidence and Clinical Practice : Short title:Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Galen medical journal · 2026Review
- Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diabetic Patients.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Validation of complex PCI criteria in drug-coated balloon angioplasty.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Observational
- Study on the relationship between in-stent neoatherosclerosis and chronic kidney disease: an optical coherence tomography study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predictive value of combined MHR and Lp(a) for in-stent restenosis in coronary heart disease patients: a study based on GEE model.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Clinical Significance of Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In-Stent Restenosis Within Drug-Eluting Stents: Impact on Patient Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- A Meta-Analysis of 3-Year Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloons Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Small-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- The miracle of IVUS for unforeseen stent thrombosis: A case report.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- In-Stent Restenosis Overview: From Intravascular Imaging to Optimal Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Intrastent Restenosis: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Factors influencing coronary artery target lesion revascularization after drug-coated balloon angioplasty.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Consensus of the National Heart Center in collaboration With the Saudi Arabian Cardiac Interventional Society on the Clinical Use of Intracoronary Imaging.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2024Article
- Drug-Eluting Stent Restenosis: Modern Approach to a Classic Challenge.Current cardiology reviews · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the introduction of drug-eluting stents to combat the neointimal hyperplasia that occurred after BMS implantation, in-stent restenosis is still encountered in a significant number of patients, particularly as increasingly complex lesions are tackled by percutaneous coronary intervention. Many biological and mechanical factors interplay to produce restenosis, some of which are avoidable. Intravascular imaging provided unique insights into various forms of stent-related mechanical issues that contribute to this phenomenon. From a practical perspective, intravascular imaging can therefore help to optimize the stenting procedure to avert these issues. Moreover, once the problem of restenosis eventuates, imaging can guide the management by tackling the underlying identified mechanism. Finally, it can be used to evaluate the re-intervention results. Nevertheless, with the emergence of different treatment options, more evidence is needed to define patient/lesion-specific characteristics that may help to tailor treatment selection in a way that improves clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.