ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2022
Developing and Validating an Emergency Triage Model Using Machine Learning Algorithms with Medical Big Data.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving triage performance in emergency departments using machine learning and natural language processing: a systematic review.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Conformal selective prediction with cost aware deferral for safe clinical triage under distribution shift.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning-based emergency triage model: a feasibility and effectiveness study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven triage in emergency departments: a comparative study of machine learning approaches.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Uncloaking the black-box: the need for explainable artificial intelligence in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases applications.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- AI-driven healthcare innovations for enhancing clinical services during mass gatherings (Hajj): task force insights and future directions.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Mapping and Summarizing the Research on AI Systems for Automating Medical History Taking and Triage: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Medicine: A Narrative Review.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Triage in Hospital Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review.Cureus · 2024Article
- Perceived Causes and Effects of Overcrowding Among Nurses in the Emergency Departments of Tertiary Hospitals: A Multicenter Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2024Article
- In-Hospital Mortality Prediction Model for Critically Ill Older Adult Patients Transferred from the Emergency Department to the Intensive Care Unit.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To establish an emergency triage model through the statistical analysis of big data during a particular time period from a hospital information system to improve the accuracy of triage in emergency department (ED). Methods: A total of 276,164 patients who visited the Emergency Medicine Department of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from 2017 to 2020 were included in this study, including 123,392 men and 152,772 women aged from 14 to 112 years. The baseline characteristics (age and gender) and medical records (patient's condition, body temperature, heart rate, breathing, blood pressure, consciousness, and oxygen saturation) of the patients was collected. The data samples were randomly allocated, with 80% as the training set and 20% as the testing set. The patients were divided into levels I, II, III, and IV in accordance with a four-level triage standard. We selected the effective Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm as our emergency classification prediction model. The XGBoost model was applied to simulate the thinking process of triage nurses, and the De Long's test was used to compare the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of different models. The Results: Level I had 4960 (1.8%) patients, level II had 25,646 (9.29%), level III had 130,664 (47.31%), and level IV had 114,894 (41.6%). The XGBoost model was built following a logic exercise based on the traditional manual pre-inspection and triage results. After verification, the prediction accuracy was 82.57%. The AUC of each disease severity level (levels I, II, III, and IV) was 0.9629, 0.9554, 0.9120, and 0.9296, respectively. Conclusion: The emergency triage prediction model, which achieved a relatively strong accuracy rate, can reduce the work intensity of medical workers and improve their working efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.