Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36017016›Full record

SynthesisContrast media & molecular imaging2022

Effect of Calcium Channel Blockers versus Diuretics for Hypertension.

Yi Chunxue, Zhang Jianming, Wang Jianbing

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi ChunxueChongqing University, Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China.
Zhang JianmingChongqing University, Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7975-7433
Wang JianbingChongqing University, Three Gorges Hospital, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7594-1724
Chongqing University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are recognized as clinical first-line agents for the treatment of hypertension, their use in combination with diuretics in cardiovascular disease caused by hypertension remains controversial. Methods: We searched the three major databases of the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed for the terms "calcium channel blockers," "thiazide diuretics," "loop diuretics," and "hypertension," "randomized controlled trials" and "meta-analysis trials." These terms were searched from January 1991 to October 2021. Results: For the primary outcome, in 5 studies including 35,057 patients, there was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality with calcium channel blockers compared with diuretics ( Conclusion: There is no statistically significant difference between calcium channel blockers and diuretics in terms of cardiovascular clinical prognosis in hypertensive patients, but there are positive implications for clinical guidance, which need to be fully validated in new large randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHypertensionAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDiureticsHumansAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDiuretics

Identifiers

PMID36017016
PMCPMC9388284
OpenAlexW4291007321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.