ReviewContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Clinical Efficacy of Endoscopic Infratentorial Supracerebellar Approach for Pineal Region Tumors: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.
Review in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The supracerebellar approach to pineal lesions: A review of history, evolution, and outcomes.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Conclusions.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026Review
- The Infratentorial Supracerebellar Approach: The Most Used Avenue for Pineal and Pineal Region Tumors: How We Do It.Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery · 2026Article
- Clinico-radiological Analysis and outcomes of management of pineal region space occupying lesions: A multi-departmental, retrospective case series from Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tumors in the pineal region are deep, with complex surrounding anatomy, adjacent to important blood vessels and nerve structures, and surgical resection is difficult and risky. In this paper, we reviewed the literature to understand the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of pineal region tumors in the country and study the clinical indications, related problems, and successful experiences of patients with pineal region tumors treated by the transtentorial-superior approach. The clinical data of 80 patients with pineal region tumors were selected as the retrospective research objects and divided into the control group and the treatment group, with 40 cases in each group, according to the random number table method. The control group was treated using the endoscopic transtentorial approach (Poppen approach), while the treatment group was treated with the endoscopic supratentorial approach (Krause approach). The inflammatory factors, inflammatory stress response, postoperative neurological dysfunction, clinical efficacy, and poor prognosis were observed and compared between the two groups. Tumor resection and recurrence were used to compare the clinical outcomes of tumors in the pineal region. The extent of surgical resection was 100% higher in both groups, and the treatment group was comparable to the control group. The prognosis of patients after the operation was poor. Nausea and vomiting, visual disturbance, upper vision paralysis, and ataxia in the treatment group were significantly lower than those in the control group, with no statistical significance (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.