Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016942›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2022

Coagulation and complement: Key innate defense participants in a seamless web.

Edward L G Pryzdial, Alexander Leatherdale, Edward M Conway

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Evolution of the Caprini risk assessment score: 1991 to present: A living risk assessment tool.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The expanded immunoregulatory protease network in mosquitoes is governed by gene coexpression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward L G PryzdialCentre for Blood Research, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Alexander LeatherdaleCentre for Blood Research, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Edward M ConwayCentre for Blood Research, Life Sciences Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 1969, Dr. Oscar Ratnoff, a pioneer in delineating the mechanisms by which coagulation is activated and complement is regulated, wrote, "In the study of biological processes, the accumulation of information is often accelerated by a narrow point of view. The fastest way to investigate the body's defenses against injury is to look individually at such isolated questions as how the blood clots or how complement works. We must constantly remind ourselves that such distinctions are man-made. In life, as in the legal cliché, the devices through which the body protects itself form a seamless web, unwrinkled by our artificialities." Our aim in this review, is to highlight the critical molecular and cellular interactions between coagulation and complement, and how these two major component proteolytic pathways contribute to the seamless web of innate mechanisms that the body uses to protect itself from injury, invading pathogens and foreign surfaces.

Indexed as

Complement System ProteinsThrombosisBlood CoagulationCell CommunicationHumansComplement System Proteinscoagulationcomplementcontact systeminnate immunityNETsproteolysis

Identifiers

PMID36016942
PMCPMC9398469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.