Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016849›Full record

ArticleDisease markers2022

Diagnosis of Genital Tuberculosis in Infertile Women by Using the Composite Reference Standard.

Riden Saxena, Kriti Shrinet, Sachchida Nand Rai, Kamal Singh, Shivi Jain, Shuchi Jain, Deeksha Singh, Shampa Anupurba, Madhu Jain

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Riden SaxenaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, 221005, Varanasi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8969-2570
Kriti ShrinetSchool of Biotechnology, Banaras Hindu University, 221005, Varanasi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6854-3069
Sachchida Nand RaiCentre of Biotechnology, University of Allahabad, 211002, Prayagraj, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-9549
Kamal SinghDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, 221005, Varanasi, India.
Shivi JainDepartment of Radiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, 221005, Varanasi, India.
Shuchi JainDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, 221005, Varanasi, India.
Deeksha SinghDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, 221005, Varanasi, India.
Shampa AnupurbaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, 221005, Varanasi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7644-1086
Madhu JainDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, 221005, Varanasi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7073-4902
Institute of Medical Sciences · INIFTM University · INRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences · INUniversity of Allahabad · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female genital tuberculosis (FGTB) can be asymptomatic or even masquerade as other gynecological conditions. Conventional methods of FGTB diagnosis include various imaging, bacteriological, molecular, and pathological techniques that are only positive in a small percentage of patients, leaving many cases with undiagnosed condition. In the absence of a perfect diagnostic method, composite reference standards (CRSs) have been advocated in this diagnostic study. This study assesses the agreement between traditional diagnostic modalities using CRS and prevalent TB groups among different fallopian tube infertility manifestations. A total of 86 women with primary and secondary infertility were included in the study and subjected to bacteriological, pathological, and radiological examination for the diagnosis of FGTB. Results were evaluated statistically for concordance of the diagnostic tests to the CRS by sensitivity and specificity, while PPV and NPV were calculated for the performance of diagnostic tests of FGTB. We observed that 11.2% of women were found to be true positives by means of CRS. The positive findings by CRS were as follows: ultrasonography (13.9%), laparoscopy (14%), hysteroscopy (12%), GeneXpert (4.8%), culture (4.8%), polymerase chain reaction (4.8%), and histopathology (6.4%). GeneXpert and culture were found to have a perfect agreement with CRS. Hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy, and hysteroscopy have a fair agreement with CRS. Out of 43 women with tubal factor infertility, 6 women were found in the definitive TB group with mixed conditions of tubal manifestations. This study evaluates and demonstrates the reliability of the collective assessment of various diagnostic methods with CRS findings that help in identifying different TB groups of genital tuberculosis patients from all infertile patients by applying the criteria of CRS.

Indexed as

Infertility, FemaleTuberculosis, Female GenitalFemaleGenitaliaHumansReference StandardsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID36016849
PMCPMC9398877
OpenAlexW4292004377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.