Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016837›Full record

ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2022

[Control of cervical cancer in the primary care setting in South American countries: systematic reviewControl del cáncer cervicouterino en los servicios de atención primaria de salud en los países de América del Sur: revisión sistemática].

Raisa Santos Cerqueira, Hebert Luan Pereira Campos Dos Santos, Nilia Maria de Brito Lima Prado, Rebecca Gusmão Bittencourt, Daniela Gomes Dos Santos Biscarde, Adriano Maia Dos Santos

Open access · diamondAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raisa Santos CerqueiraUniversidade Federal da Bahia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva Vitória da Conquista (BA) Brasil Universidade Federal da Bahia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Vitória da Conquista (BA), Brasil.
Hebert Luan Pereira Campos Dos SantosUniversidade Federal da Bahia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva Vitória da Conquista (BA) Brasil Universidade Federal da Bahia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Vitória da Conquista (BA), Brasil.
Nilia Maria de Brito Lima PradoUniversidade Federal da Bahia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva Vitória da Conquista (BA) Brasil Universidade Federal da Bahia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Vitória da Conquista (BA), Brasil.
Rebecca Gusmão BittencourtUniversidade Federal da Bahia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva Vitória da Conquista (BA) Brasil Universidade Federal da Bahia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Vitória da Conquista (BA), Brasil.
Daniela Gomes Dos Santos BiscardeUniversidade Federal da Bahia Escola de Enfermagem Salvador (BA) Brasil Universidade Federal da Bahia, Escola de Enfermagem, Salvador (BA), Brasil.
Adriano Maia Dos SantosUniversidade Federal da Bahia Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva Vitória da Conquista (BA) Brasil Universidade Federal da Bahia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Vitória da Conquista (BA), Brasil.
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe cervical cancer (CC) prevention and control strategies in the primary care setting in South America. Method: Two review steps were performed: review of documents published in governmental websites in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay, and Venezuela; and systematic review of the literature available in LILACS, MEDLINE, Scopus, SciELO, and Science Direct databases. Results: Twenty-one institutional documents (plans, practice guides, and national guidelines) and 25 journal articles were included. All countries had high CC morbidity and mortality rates. Screening in primary healthcare (PHC) was mostly opportunistic, although the institutional documents indicated an intention and strategies for early diagnosis and longitudinal follow-up of suspected and confirmed cases, preferably within the public healthcare system. All countries adopted a broad view of PHC, although the stage of PHC implementation was heterogeneous in different countries, with predominance of selective PHC. Access to screening was more difficult for women from rural or remote areas and for indigenous populations. The unavailability of PHC close to households/communities was an important barrier for CC screening. Conclusions: The fragmentation of healthcare systems and the selective provision of services are barriers for the prevention and control of CC in South America. Organized CC screening programs and active search for Papanicolaou testing in primary care are needed. Intercultural practices and intersectional public policies are essential to overcome the inequities in CC control in South American countries.

Indexed as

Papanicolaou testprimary healthcareSouth Americauniversal access to health care servicesUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36016837
PMCPMC9395576
OpenAlexW4292966237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.