Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016613›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Machine-learning-based contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomic analysis for categorization of ovarian tumors.

Jiaojiao Li, Tianzhu Zhang, Juanwei Ma, Ningnannan Zhang, Zhang Zhang, Zhaoxiang Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Multimodal ultrasound-based radiomics and deep learning for differential diagnosis of O-RADS 4-5 adnexal masses.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cancer medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiaojiao LiDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianzhu ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Juanwei MaDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Ningnannan ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Zhang ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Zhaoxiang YeDepartment of Radiology, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine-learning-based contrast-enhanced CT radiomic analysis for categorizing benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Methods: A total of 1,329 patients with ovarian tumors were randomly divided into a training cohort (N=930) and a validation cohort (N=399). All tumors were resected, and pathological findings were confirmed. Radiomic features were extracted from the portal venous phase images of contrast-enhanced CT. The clinical predictors included age, CA-125, HE-4, ascites, and margin of tumor. Both radiomics model (including selected radiomic features) and mixed model (incorporating selected radiomic features and clinical predictors) were constructed respectively. Six classifiers [k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)] were used for each model. The mean relative standard deviation (RSD) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were applied to evaluate and select the best classifiers. Then, the performances of the two models with selected classifiers were assessed in the validation cohort. Results: The MLP classifier with the least RSD (1.21 and 0.53, respectively) was selected as the best classifier in both radiomics and mixed models. The two models with MLP classifier performed well in the validation cohort, with the AUCs of 0.91 and 0.96 and with accuracies (ACCs) of 0.83 and 0.87, respectively. The Delong test showed that the AUC of mixed model was statistically different from that of radiomics model ( Conclusions: Machine-learning-based CT radiomic analysis could categorize ovarian tumors with good performance preoperatively. The mixed model with MLP classifier may be a potential tool in clinical applications.

Indexed as

classificationcomputed tomographymachine learningovarian neoplasmsradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36016613
PMCPMC9395674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.