ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Machine-learning-based contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomic analysis for categorization of ovarian tumors.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomography-Based Machine Learning Models in the Classification of Adnexal Masses - A Systematic Review.F1000Research · 2026Pooled it
- Performance of radiomics analysis in ultrasound imaging for differentiating benign from malignant adnexal masses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- A panel of machine learning approaches for diagnostic model development and validation in ovarian cancer.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- A Review on Biomarker-Enhanced Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction in Ovarian Cancer Management.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Multimodal ultrasound-based radiomics and deep learning for differential diagnosis of O-RADS 4-5 adnexal masses.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence radiomics in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of gynecological cancer: a literature review.Translational cancer research · 2025Review
- Concomitant Prediction of the Ki67 and PIT-1 Expression in Pituitary Adenoma Using Different Radiomics Models.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Radiomics and radiogenomics: extracting more information from medical images for the diagnosis and prognostic prediction of ovarian cancer.Military Medical Research · 2024Review
- CT-based radiomic analysis for categorization of ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors and epithelial ovarian cancers.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- Article
- Advances in ovarian cancer radiomics: a bibliometric analysis from 2010 to 2024.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of CT and MRI radiomics in ovarian cancer: methodological issues and clinical utility.Insights into imaging · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine-learning-based contrast-enhanced CT radiomic analysis for categorizing benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Methods: A total of 1,329 patients with ovarian tumors were randomly divided into a training cohort (N=930) and a validation cohort (N=399). All tumors were resected, and pathological findings were confirmed. Radiomic features were extracted from the portal venous phase images of contrast-enhanced CT. The clinical predictors included age, CA-125, HE-4, ascites, and margin of tumor. Both radiomics model (including selected radiomic features) and mixed model (incorporating selected radiomic features and clinical predictors) were constructed respectively. Six classifiers [k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machines (SVM), random forest (RF), logistic regression (LR), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)] were used for each model. The mean relative standard deviation (RSD) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were applied to evaluate and select the best classifiers. Then, the performances of the two models with selected classifiers were assessed in the validation cohort. Results: The MLP classifier with the least RSD (1.21 and 0.53, respectively) was selected as the best classifier in both radiomics and mixed models. The two models with MLP classifier performed well in the validation cohort, with the AUCs of 0.91 and 0.96 and with accuracies (ACCs) of 0.83 and 0.87, respectively. The Delong test showed that the AUC of mixed model was statistically different from that of radiomics model ( Conclusions: Machine-learning-based CT radiomic analysis could categorize ovarian tumors with good performance preoperatively. The mixed model with MLP classifier may be a potential tool in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.