Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016444›Full record

SynthesisViruses2022

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Serologic Response following Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Atsushi Sakuraba, Alexander Luna, Dejan Micic

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessment ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Predominantly defective CD8Journal of translational medicine · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. COVID‑19 vaccination in liver transplant recipients (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Atsushi SakurabaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC 4076, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2519-6129
Alexander LunaDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC 4076, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Dejan MicicDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Ave. MC 4076, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at greater risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and have attenuated response to vaccinations. In the present meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the serologic response to the COVID-19 vaccine in SOT recipients. A search of electronic databases was conducted to identify SOT studies that reported the serologic response to COVID-19 vaccination. We analyzed 44 observational studies including 6158 SOT recipients. Most studies were on mRNA vaccination (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2). After a single and two doses of vaccine, serologic response rates were 8.6% (95% CI 6.8-11.0) and 34.2% (95% CI 30.1-38.7), respectively. Compared to controls, response rates were lower after a single and two doses of vaccine (OR 0.0049 [95% CI 0.0021-0.012] and 0.0057 [95% CI 0.0030-0.011], respectively). A third dose improved the rate to 65.6% (95% CI 60.4-70.2), but in a subset of patients who had not achieved a response after two doses, it remained low at 35.7% (95% CI 21.2-53.3). In summary, only a small proportion of SOT recipients achieved serologic response to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, and that even the third dose had an insufficient response. Alternative strategies for prophylaxis in SOT patients need to be developed.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesOrgan TransplantationVaccinesAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 TestingHumansmRNA VaccinesVaccinationVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesVaccinesVaccines, SyntheticCOVID-19heart transplantimmunocompromisedkidney transplantlung transplantmeta-analysisoutcomessolid organ transplantvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36016444
PMCPMC9413038
OpenAlexW4292575688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.