Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016431›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Experimental Infection of Brazilian Free-Tailed Bats (

Angela M Bosco-Lauth, Stephanie M Porter, Karen A Fox, Mary E Wood, Daniel Neubaum, Marissa Quilici

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Angela M Bosco-LauthDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Stephanie M PorterU.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Karen A FoxColorado Parks and Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Mary E WoodColorado Parks and Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Daniel NeubaumColorado Parks and Wildlife, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6642-4063
Marissa QuiliciDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife · USColorado State University · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is presumed to have originated from wildlife and shares homology with other bat coronaviruses. Determining the susceptibility of North American bat species to SARS-CoV-2 is of utmost importance for making decisions regarding wildlife management, public health, and conservation. In this study, Brazilian free-tailed bats (

Indexed as

ChiropteraCOVID-19AnimalsAnimals, WildHumansRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2RNA, ViralBrazilian free-tailed batinfectionSARS-CoV-2Tadarida brasiliensis

Identifiers

PMID36016431
PMCPMC9412320
OpenAlexW4292337178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.