Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016403›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Assessment on Different Vaccine Formulation Parameters in the Protection against Heterologous Challenge with FMDV in Cattle.

Sebastián Di Giacomo, Danilo Bucafusco, Juan Manuel Schammas, Juan Pega, María Cruz Miraglia, Florencia Barrionuevo, Alejandra Victoria Capozzo, Daniel Mariano Perez-Filgueira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Viral Diseases in Water Buffalo (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sebastián Di GiacomoInstituto de Virología e Innovaciones Tecnológicas, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Técnicas (INTA-CONICET), N. Repetto y De Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham 1686, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Danilo BucafuscoInstituto de Virología e Innovaciones Tecnológicas, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Técnicas (INTA-CONICET), N. Repetto y De Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham 1686, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan Manuel SchammasInstituto de Virología e Innovaciones Tecnológicas, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Técnicas (INTA-CONICET), N. Repetto y De Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham 1686, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan PegaInstituto de Virología e Innovaciones Tecnológicas, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Técnicas (INTA-CONICET), N. Repetto y De Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham 1686, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
María Cruz MiragliaInstituto de Virología e Innovaciones Tecnológicas, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Técnicas (INTA-CONICET), N. Repetto y De Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham 1686, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Florencia BarrionuevoInstituto de Virología e Innovaciones Tecnológicas, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Técnicas (INTA-CONICET), N. Repetto y De Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham 1686, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Alejandra Victoria CapozzoInstituto de Virología e Innovaciones Tecnológicas, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Técnicas (INTA-CONICET), N. Repetto y De Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham 1686, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniel Mariano Perez-FilgueiraInstituto de Virología e Innovaciones Tecnológicas, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas (CICVyA), Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Técnicas (INTA-CONICET), N. Repetto y De Los Reseros s/n (1686), Hurlingham 1686, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARNational Agricultural Technology Institute · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) remains one of the major threats to animal health worldwide. Its causative agent, the FMD virus (FMDV), affects cloven-hoofed animals, including farm animals and wildlife species, inflicting severe damage to the international trade and livestock industry. FMDV antigenic variability remains one of the biggest challenges for vaccine-based control strategies. The current study analyzed the host's adaptive immune responses in cattle immunized with different vaccine protocols and investigated its associations with the clinical outcome after infection with a heterologous strain of FMDV. The results showed that antigenic payload, multivalency, and revaccination may impact on the clinical outcome after heterologous challenge with FMDV. Protection from the experimental infection was related to qualitative traits of the elicited antibodies, such as avidity, IgG isotype composition, and specificity diversity, modulating and reflecting the vaccine-induced maturation of the humoral response. The correlation analyses of the serum avidity obtained per vaccinated individual might suggest that conventional vaccination can induce high-affinity immunoglobulins against conserved epitopes even within different FMDV serotypes. Cross-reaction among strains by these high-affinity antibodies may support further protection against a heterologous infection with FMDV.

Indexed as

Cattle DiseasesFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseFoot-and-Mouth Disease VirusViral VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, ViralCattleCommerceInternationalityAntibodies, ViralViral VaccinescattleFMDVheterologous protection

Identifiers

PMID36016403
PMCPMC9416185
OpenAlexW4293679918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.