ArticleViruses2022
Evaluation of EPISEQ SARS-CoV-2 and a Fully Integrated Application to Identify SARS-CoV-2 Variants from Several Next-Generation Sequencing Approaches.
Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole-genome sequencing has become an essential tool for real-time genomic surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) worldwide. The handling of raw next-generation sequencing (NGS) data is a major challenge for sequencing laboratories. We developed an easy-to-use web-based application (EPISEQ SARS-CoV-2) to analyse SARS-CoV-2 NGS data generated on common sequencing platforms using a variety of commercially available reagents. This application performs in one click a quality check, a reference-based genome assembly, and the analysis of the generated consensus sequence as to coverage of the reference genome, mutation screening and variant identification according to the up-to-date Nextstrain clade and Pango lineage. In this study, we validated the EPISEQ SARS-CoV-2 pipeline against a reference pipeline and compared the performance of NGS data generated by different sequencing protocols using EPISEQ SARS-CoV-2. We showed a strong agreement in SARS-CoV-2 clade and lineage identification (>99%) and in spike mutation detection (>99%) between EPISEQ SARS-CoV-2 and the reference pipeline. The comparison of several sequencing approaches using EPISEQ SARS-CoV-2 revealed 100% concordance in clade and lineage classification. It also uncovered reagent-related sequencing issues with a potential impact on SARS-CoV-2 mutation reporting. Altogether, EPISEQ SARS-CoV-2 allows an easy, rapid and reliable analysis of raw NGS data to support the sequencing efforts of laboratories with limited bioinformatics capacity and those willing to accelerate genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.