Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016265›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Six-Month Follow-Up of Immune Responses after a Rapid Mass Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with BNT162b2 in the District of Schwaz/Austria.

Zoltán Bánki, Lisa Seekircher, Barbara Falkensammer, David Bante, Helena Schäfer, Teresa Harthaller, Janine Kimpel, Peter Willeit, Dorothee von Laer, Wegene Borena

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Zoltán BánkiInstitute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3826-5800
Lisa SeekircherClinical Epidemiology Team, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Barbara FalkensammerInstitute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
David BanteInstitute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5617-8022
Helena SchäferInstitute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Teresa HarthallerInstitute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Janine KimpelInstitute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5210-7905
Peter WilleitClinical Epidemiology Team, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1866-7159
Dorothee von LaerInstitute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Wegene BorenaInstitute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8011-5825
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to a large outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 Beta (B.1.351) variant in the district Schwaz, Austria, a rapid mass vaccination campaign with BNT162b2 was carried out in spring 2021, immunizing more than 70% of the adult population within one week. Subsequent analysis revealed that the mass vaccination was associated with a significant reduction in new SARS-CoV-2 infections compared to control districts. Here, we aimed to evaluate both SARS-CoV-2-specific T- and B-cell responses at 35 ± 8 and 215 ± 7 days after the second dose in 600 study subjects who participated at both time points. Overall, a robust antibody and T-cell response was measured at day 35, which waned over time. Nevertheless, all persons preserved seropositivity and T cell response could still be detected in about half of the participants at day 215. Further, antibody response correlated negatively with age; however, in persons who experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to study enrolment, the serum levels of both S- and N-specific antibodies surprisingly increased with age. In contrast, there was no correlation of T cell response with age. We could not detect any sex-related difference in the immune responses. SARS-CoV-2 infections prior to study enrolment or incident infections before day 215 resulted in higher antibody levels and T cell responses at day 215 compared to study participants with no history of infection. Collectively, our data support that vaccination with BNT162b2 against COVID-19 provides a durable immune response and emphasize the usefulness of vaccination even after a natural infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2AdultAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationAustriaBNT162 VaccineFollow-Up StudiesHumansMass VaccinationVaccinationAntibodies, ViralBNT162 Vaccineantibody responseCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2T cell responsevaccination

Identifiers

PMID36016265
PMCPMC9414611
OpenAlexW4288491434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.