Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016248›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against Omicron Variant among Underage Subjects: The Veneto Region's Experience.

Silvia Cocchio, Federico Zabeo, Giulia Tremolada, Giacomo Facchin, Giovanni Venturato, Thomas Marcon, Mario Saia, Michele Tonon, Michele Mongillo, Filippo Da Re and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Minimising school disruption under high incidence conditions due to the Omicron variant in France, Switzerland, Italy, in January 2022.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia CocchioDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Federico ZabeoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6321-7272
Giulia TremoladaDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Giacomo FacchinDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Giovanni VenturatoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Thomas MarconAzienda Zero (Veneto Region), 35100 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1028-8119
Mario SaiaAzienda Zero (Veneto Region), 35100 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2235-1325
Michele TononRegional Directorate of Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary, Public Health-Veneto Region, 30123 Venice, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4917-404X
Michele MongilloRegional Directorate of Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary, Public Health-Veneto Region, 30123 Venice, Italy.
Filippo Da ReRegional Directorate of Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary, Public Health-Veneto Region, 30123 Venice, Italy.
Francesca RussoRegional Directorate of Prevention, Food Safety, Veterinary, Public Health-Veneto Region, 30123 Venice, Italy.
Vincenzo BaldoDepartment of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6012-9453
Regione del Veneto · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even if most of the complications due to COVID-19 are observed in the elderly, in Italy the impact of COVID-19 among young people has not been negligible. Furthermore, their contribution to SARS-CoV-2 circulation is still unclear. These reasons have driven policy makers to involve subjects aged 5 to 17 years in the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. However, the trade-off of vaccinating this age-group should be further investigated, especially in view of the rise of new immunologically evasive variants of concern (VOCs). We used regional databases to retrospectively estimate vaccine effectiveness over time of each approved vaccination schedule among children (5-11) and adolescents (12-17). Our findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccines were highly effective and their protection levels lasted longer during a period of Delta variant predominance, whereas they offered just mild to moderate levels of protection-apparently affected by a rapid waning effect-in a period of Omicron variant predominance. Considering these results, it is plausible to evaluate a reformulation of possible future COVID-19 vaccination campaigns among underage subjects. However, effectiveness against serious complications due to COVID-19, as well as indirect benefits of underage vaccinations, should first be addressed. Furthermore, vaccine effectiveness should be kept monitored, as new VOCs may arise, but also new adapted vaccines may start being administered.

Indexed as

age-group of adolescentsage-group of childrenCOVID-19DeltaOmicronpublic healthSARS-CoV-2vaccine effectivenessvaccinesVOCs

Identifiers

PMID36016248
PMCPMC9413750
OpenAlexW4292575491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.