Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016237›Full record

ReviewVaccines2022

Global Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Systematic Review.

Carla Pires

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carla PiresEscola de Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde, CBIOS-Universidade Lusófona's Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies, Campo Grande, 376, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4526-0271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundvaccine hesitancy is defined as a delay in the acceptance or refusal of vaccination, even though immunisation is a determinant in reducing the mortality and morbidity associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

aimto identify and analyse the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and/or hesitancy.

methodsa systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. KEYWORDS: vaccine and (COVID or SARS) and (acceptance or acceptability or willingness or hesitancy or refusal) and (multivariate or regression) and (questionnaire or survey) and national. Databases/resources: PubMed, DOAJ, SciELO and b-on. Timeframe: March 2020-2022. INCLUSION CRITERIA: general population, questionnaire-based, calculation of a multivariate regression model and national studies. QUALITY ASSESSMENT: application of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood institute (NHLBI) tool.

resultsa total of 37 studies were selected, whose overall rate was fair. The most predominant predictors of vaccine hesitancy were a lower perceived risk of getting infected, a lower level of institutional trust, not being vaccinated against influenza, lower levels of perceived severity of COVID-19, or stronger beliefs that the vaccination would cause side effects or be unsafe. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionthe identified predictors can be used to design tailored health policies and/or public health interventions, or to evaluate subjects' vaccine hesitancy.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccinesmultivariate regression modelsnational studiespredictors of vaccine hesitancyPRISMAquestionnaire-based studiessystematic reviewsvaccine acceptancevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36016237
PMCPMC9415631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.