Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016213›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Short-Term Adverse Effects Immediately after the Start of COVID-19 Booster Vaccination in Vietnam.

Duy Cuong Nguyen, Thi Loi Dao, Thi Minh Dieu Truong, Thu Huong Nguyen, Thu Nga Phan, Ha My Nguyen, Thi Dung Pham, Xuan Bai Nguyen, Thanh Binh Nguyen, Van Thuan Hoang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Health and Well-Being through COVID-19 Vaccination: Physical, Oral, and Psychological Effects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Duy Cuong NguyenThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam.
Thi Loi DaoThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam.
Thi Minh Dieu TruongThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam.
Thu Huong NguyenThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam.
Thu Nga PhanThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam.
Ha My NguyenThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam.
Thi Dung PhamThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam.
Xuan Bai NguyenThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam.
Thanh Binh NguyenThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam.
Van Thuan HoangThai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Thai Binh 410000, Vietnam.
Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Risk communication is necessary to improve the booster vaccination rate, but Vietnam does not have a system to collect and disclose such information. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify adverse reactions and their frequency in the early period after booster vaccination, and to obtain primary data for improving the booster vaccination rate. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among adults aged ≥18 years. Clinical data were collected 14 days after booster vaccination by using a standard questionnaire. Results: A total of 1322 participants were included with median age = 23 and sex ratio (Male/Female) = 0.53. AstraZeneca was the most commonly used vaccine for the first and second doses, while Pfizer was the most commonly used vaccine for booster shots. Injection site pain, fatigue, and myalgia were the most common side effect reported (71.9%, 28.1%, and 21.8%, respectively). Compared to previous COVID-19 vaccine injections, 81.9% of participants reported that their symptoms were similar or milder after receiving the booster dose. They were more likely to present injection site pain (OR = 1.43, p < 0.0001) and lymphadenopathy (OR = 4.76, p < 0.0001) after receiving the booster shot. Fever (OR = 0.33, p < 0.0001) and fatigue (OR = 0.77, p = 0.002) were less often reported after booster shots compared to the first and second injections. The severity of symptoms occurring after booster dose versus first and second doses increased significantly with each additional year of age and among participants receiving the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Conclusion: Adverse reactions to booster vaccination are minor and their incidence is the same as for the first or the second vaccination. Multicenter studies with larger sample sizes on the side effects and safety of COVID-19 vaccine booster shots need to be conducted to make the population less worried, in order to increase the vaccination rate, to protect individuals’ and communities’ health.

Indexed as

boosterCOVID-19side effectvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36016213
PMCPMC9414515
OpenAlexW4292318074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.