ArticleVaccines2022
Association between Adverse Reactions to the First and Second Doses of COVID-19 Vaccine.
Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low-inflammatory lipid nanoparticle-based mRNA vaccine elicits protective immunity against H5N1 influenza virus with reduced adverse reactions.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- Updated beliefs and shaken confidence: evidence from vaccine hesitancy caused by experiencing "COVID arm".BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Are We Prepared for the Next Pandemic? Management, Systematic Evaluation and Lessons Learned from an In-Hospital COVID-19 Vaccination Centre for Healthcare Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Adherence and Reactogenicity to Vaccines against SARS-COV-2 in 285 Patients with Neuropathy: A Multicentric Study.Brain sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the frequency of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines in Japan and the impact of first-dose adverse reactions on second-dose adverse reactions. Individuals who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine at our center in March or April 2021 were included. Data were collected using questionnaires. The main factors were age (<40, 40−59, and >60 years), sex, underlying disease, and first-dose adverse reaction. The primary outcomes were incidence of local and systemic adverse reactions (ARs) attributable to the vaccine. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 671 participants, 90% experienced local or systemic ARs. An AR to the first dose was associated with a significantly increased risk of an AR to the second dose (OR: 49.63, 95% CI: 21.96−112.16). ARs were less common among men than among women (OR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.17−0.76). Local ARs were less common among those aged 60 years or older (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.18−0.66), whereas systemic ARs were more common among those aged under 40 years. Information on ARs to the first dose is important for healthcare providers and recipients when making vaccination decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.