Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016119›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

COVID-19 Vaccination Intent, Barriers and Facilitators in Healthcare Workers: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study on 2500 Employees at LMU University Hospital in Munich, Germany.

Ana Zhelyazkova, Selina Kim, Matthias Klein, Stephan Prueckner, Sophia Horster, Philipp Kressirer, Alexander Choukér, Michaela Coenen, Kristina Adorjan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ana ZhelyazkovaInstitute of Emergency Medicine and Management in Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8085-5003
Selina KimInstitute of Emergency Medicine and Management in Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Matthias KleinDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Stephan PruecknerInstitute of Emergency Medicine and Management in Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Sophia HorsterAdministrative Department, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.
Philipp KressirerDepartment of Communication and Media, University Hospital Munich Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Alexander ChoukérLaboratory of Translational Research Stress and Immunity, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0133-4104
Michaela CoenenInstitute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology-IBE, Chair of Public Health and Health Services Research, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7492-7907
Kristina AdorjanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the role of healthcare workers (HCW) in promoting vaccine uptake and previously recorded hesitancy among HCW, we aim to examine the COVID-19 vaccination intent and status of HCW through a cross-sectional anonymous online survey at LMU University Hospital in Munich. Data collection was informed by the Health Belief Model (HBM) and focused on vaccination intent, status and on potential factors affecting the decision-making process. In total, 2555 employees completed the questionnaire. Our data showed that an approving attitude towards recommended vaccines and having received an influenza vaccine in the previous winter were strongly associated with COVID-19 vaccination intent. Further, a positive COVID-19 vaccination status was associated with a higher likelihood of approving the extension of the validity of non-pharmaceutical interventions at the workplace. Our HBM-analysis demonstrated strong associations between the perceived benefits and barriers and COVID-19 vaccination intent. Unchanged or low perceived susceptibility and severity were associated with refusal or indecisiveness. Our findings highlight the factors associated with the decision regarding a COVID-19 vaccine and indicate a pattern-like behavior in the acceptance of novel vaccines by HCW. These insights can help inform the communication aims of vaccination campaigns among HCW within similar organizational contexts or in future outbreaks.

Indexed as

COVID-19health belief modelhealthcare workersnon-pharmaceutical interventionsvaccinationvaccination hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36016119
PMCPMC9412572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.