Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016102›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Discussion of the Trust in Vaccination against COVID-19.

Jiangbo Fan, Xi Wang, Shuai Du, Ayan Mao, Haiping Du, Wuqi Qiu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jiangbo FanInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China.
Xi WangInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China.
Shuai DuInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China.
Ayan MaoInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China.
Haiping DuInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China.
Wuqi QiuInstitute of Medical Information, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5037-7840
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has introduced serious challenges to global public health security, and the benefits of vaccination via public health interventions have been recognized as significant. Vaccination is an effective means of preventing and controlling the spread of COVID-19. However, trust is a major factor that influences vaccine hesitancy; thus, the distrust of vaccination has hindered the popularization of COVID-19 vaccines. This paper aims to discuss the main problems and the role of trust in the vaccination against COVID-19 to effectively promote and implement policy to promote the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccinetrustvaccine confidencevaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36016102
PMCPMC9416738
OpenAlexW4289530038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.