Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36016089›Full record

ReviewVaccines2022

A U.S. Government-Coordinated Effort to Leverage Non-Human Primate Data to Facilitate Ebolavirus Vaccine Development.

Kimberly L Taylor, Lynda Lanning, Lawrence Wolfraim, Sonia Shrivastava Gales, Colleen Sico, William E Dowling, Lucy A Ward, William C Florence, Edwin Nuzum, Paula R Bryant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kimberly L TaylorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Lynda LanningCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA.
Lawrence WolfraimNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Sonia Shrivastava GalesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Colleen SicoNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
William E DowlingCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Washington, DC 20006, USA.
Lucy A WardU.S. Department of Defense (DOD), Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Defense (JPEO-CBRND), Joint Project Manager for Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Medical (JPM CBRN Medical), Fort Detrick, MD 21702, USA.
William C FlorenceNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Edwin NuzumNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Paula R BryantNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A United States Government (USG) interagency group, the Filovirus Animal Non-Clinical Group (FANG), has been established to support the development of biodefense medical countermeasures (MCMs). As both vaccines and therapeutics are licensed using "non-traditional pathways", such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Animal Rule (AR), non-human primate (NHP) models and associated assays have been developed and standardized across BSL4 testing sites to evaluate candidate products. Vaccine candidates are evaluated using these NHP models, and through this public-private partnership, a meta-analysis of NHP control data has been conducted and submitted to the FDA as a master file. This is an example of how existing NHP control data can be leveraged in lieu of conducting separate natural history studies at multiple testing facilities to demonstrate the consistency of a standardized animal model for vaccine development. As a result, animal use can be minimized and the duplication of effort avoided, thus reducing the amount of time needed to conduct additional studies, as well as the cost of vaccine candidate development. This successful strategy may be applied to other pathogens of high consequence for vaccine development, and shows how strategic preparedness for biodefense can be leveraged in response to outbreaks and public health emergencies.

Indexed as

Animal RuleebolavirusFANGfilovirusnon-human primatepublic–private partnershipregulatoryvaccine development

Identifiers

PMID36016089
PMCPMC9412622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.