Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015956›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Recent Advances in Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring and Prediction Using a Machine Learning Approach.

Siti Nor Ashikin Ismail, Nazrul Anuar Nayan, Rosmina Jaafar, Zazilah May

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Arterial blood pressure waveform reconstruction estimation from PPG using TCN-BiLSTM.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siti Nor Ashikin IsmailDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3185-9761
Nazrul Anuar NayanDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6657-2982
Rosmina JaafarDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-8019-0446
Zazilah MayDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.
National University of Malaysia · MYUniversiti Teknologi Petronas · MY

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia TRGS/1/2019/UKM/01/4/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) monitoring can be performed either invasively via arterial catheterization or non-invasively through a cuff sphygmomanometer. However, for conscious individuals, traditional cuff-based BP monitoring devices are often uncomfortable, intermittent, and impractical for frequent measurements. Continuous and non-invasive BP (NIBP) monitoring is currently gaining attention in the human health monitoring area due to its promising potentials in assessing the health status of an individual, enabled by machine learning (ML), for various purposes such as early prediction of disease and intervention treatment. This review presents the development of a non-invasive BP measuring tool called sphygmomanometer in brief, summarizes state-of-the-art NIBP sensors, and identifies extended works on continuous NIBP monitoring using commercial devices. Moreover, the NIBP predictive techniques including pulse arrival time, pulse transit time, pulse wave velocity, and ML are elaborated on the basis of bio-signals acquisition from these sensors. Additionally, the different BP values (systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure) of the various ML models adopted in several reported studies are compared in terms of the international validation standards developed by the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the British Hypertension Society (BHS) for clinically-approved BP monitors. Finally, several challenges and possible solutions for the implementation and realization of continuous NIBP technology are addressed.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationPulse Wave AnalysisBlood PressureHumansMachine LearningSphygmomanometersblood pressurecontinuous monitoringmachine learningnon-invasivesensors

Identifiers

PMID36015956
PMCPMC9412312
OpenAlexW4293510928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.