ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Data Augmentation for Deep-Learning-Based Multiclass Structural Damage Detection Using Limited Information.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research on Synthetic Data Methods and Detection Models for Micro-Cracks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Efficient crack and surface-type recognition via CNN-block development mechanism and edge profiling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the Feasibility of Deep Learning for Predicting Lignin GC-MS Analysis Results Using TGA and FT-IR.Polymers · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Structural Health Monitoring: Data, Algorithms, Applications, Challenges, and Trends.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Industrial Anomaly Detection with Skip Autoencoder and Deep Feature Extractor.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The deterioration of infrastructure's health has become more predominant on a global scale during the 21st century. Aging infrastructure as well as those structures damaged by natural disasters have prompted the research community to improve state-of-the-art methodologies for conducting Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). The necessity for efficient SHM arises from the hazards damaged infrastructure imposes, often resulting in structural collapse, leading to economic loss and human fatalities. Furthermore, day-to-day operations in these affected areas are limited until an inspection is performed to assess the level of damage experienced by the structure and the required rehabilitation determined. However, human-based inspections are often labor-intensive, inefficient, subjective, and restricted to accessible site locations, which ultimately negatively impact our ability to collect large amounts of data from inspection sites. Though Deep-Learning (DL) methods have been heavily explored in the past decade to rectify the limitations of traditional methods and automate structural inspection, data scarcity continues to remain prevalent within the field of SHM. The absence of sufficiently large, balanced, and generalized databases to train DL-based models often results in inaccurate and biased damage predictions. Recently, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) have received attention from the SHM community as a data augmentation tool by which a training dataset can be expanded to improve the damage classification. However, there are no existing studies within the SHM field which investigate the performance of DL-based multiclass damage identification using synthetic data generated from GANs. Therefore, this paper investigates the performance of a convolutional neural network architecture using synthetic images generated from a GAN for multiclass damage detection of concrete surfaces. Through this study, it was determined the average classification performance of the proposed CNN on hybrid datasets decreased by 10.6% and 7.4% for validation and testing datasets when compared to the same model trained entirely on real samples. Moreover, each model's performance decreased on average by 1.6% when comparing a singular model trained with real samples and the same model trained with both real and synthetic samples for a given training configuration. The correlation between classification accuracy and the amount and diversity of synthetic data used for data augmentation is quantified and the effect of using limited data to train existing GAN architectures is investigated. It was observed that the diversity of the samples decreases and correlation increases with the increase in the number of synthetic samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.