Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015949›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Agreement of Sleep Measures-A Comparison between a Sleep Diary and Three Consumer Wearable Devices.

Kristina Klier, Matthias Wagner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06174558 (Is My Sleep Tracker Tracking my Sleep? Validation of Two Wearable Fitness Sleep Trackers on Sleep Staging and Nocturnal Hypoxemia in Sleep Medicine Patients Referred for Diagnostic Polysomnogram), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06174558 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Is My Sleep Tracker Tracking my Sleep? Validation of Two Wearable Fitness Sleep Trackers on Sleep Staging and Nocturnal Hypoxemia in Sleep Medicine Patients Referred for Diagnostic Polysomnogram

TypeobservationalSponsorRespiratory SpecialistsRan2024 to 2024Enrolled86ConditionsObstructive Sleep ApneaArmsSleep Tracking Devices
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kristina KlierFakultät für Humanwissenschaften, Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6906-9933
Matthias WagnerFakultät für Humanwissenschaften, Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, self-tracking and optimization are widely spread. As sleep is essential for well-being, health, and peak performance, the number of available consumer technologies to assess individual sleep behavior is increasing rapidly. However, little is known about the consumer wearables' usability and reliability for sleep tracking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the sleep measures of wearable devices with a standardized sleep diary in young healthy adults in free-living conditions. We tracked night sleep from 30 participants (19 females, 11 males; 24.3 ± 4.2 years old). Each wore three wearables and simultaneously assessed individual sleep patterns for four consecutive nights. Wearables and diaries correlated substantially regarding time in bed (Range CCC

Indexed as

Wearable Electronic DevicesAdultFemaleHumansMalePolysomnographyReproducibility of ResultsSleepYoung Adultconcordanceself-trackingsleepsleep assessmentsleep diarieswearable devices

Identifiers

PMID36015949
PMCPMC9413956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.