ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Brain Decoding of Multiple Subjects for Estimating Visual Information Based on a Probabilistic Generative Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial Analysis of the Relationship between Taste and Biological Information Obtained While Eating Strawberries for Sensory Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain decoding is a process of decoding human cognitive contents from brain activities. However, improving the accuracy of brain decoding remains difficult due to the unique characteristics of the brain, such as the small sample size and high dimensionality of brain activities. Therefore, this paper proposes a method that effectively uses multi-subject brain activities to improve brain decoding accuracy. Specifically, we distinguish between the shared information common to multi-subject brain activities and the individual information based on each subject's brain activities, and both types of information are used to decode human visual cognition. Both types of information are extracted as features belonging to a latent space using a probabilistic generative model. In the experiment, an publicly available dataset and five subjects were used, and the estimation accuracy was validated on the basis of a confidence score ranging from 0 to 1, and a large value indicates superiority. The proposed method achieved a confidence score of 0.867 for the best subject and an average of 0.813 for the five subjects, which was the best compared to other methods. The experimental results show that the proposed method can accurately decode visual cognition compared with other existing methods in which the shared information is not distinguished from the individual information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.