Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015875›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Bayesian Estimation of Oscillator Parameters: Toward Anomaly Detection and Cyber-Physical System Security.

Joseph M Lukens, Ali Passian, Srikanth Yoginath, Kody J H Law, Joel A Dawson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joseph M LukensQuantum Information Science Section, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9650-4462
Ali PassianQuantum Information Science Section, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4736-4157
Srikanth YoginathSystems and Decision Sciences Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.
Kody J H LawDepartment of Mathematics, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3133-2537
Joel A DawsonEnergy and Control Systems Security Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyber-physical system security presents unique challenges to conventional measurement science and technology. Anomaly detection in software-assisted physical systems, such as those employed in additive manufacturing or in DNA synthesis, is often hampered by the limited available parameter space of the underlying mechanism that is transducing the anomaly. As a result, the formulation of anomaly detection for such systems often leads to inverse or ill-posed problems, requiring statistical treatments. Here, we present Bayesian inference of unknown parameters associated with a generic actuator considered as a representative vital element of a cyber-physical system. Via a series of experimental input-output measurements, a transfer function for the actuator is obtained numerically, which serves as our model for the proposed method. Linear, nonlinear, and delayed dynamics may be assumed for the actuator response. By devising a code-based malicious signal, we study the efficacy of Bayesian inference for its potential to produce a detection, including uncertainty quantification, with a remarkably small number of input data points. Our approach should be adaptable to a variety of real-time cyber-physical anomaly detection scenarios.

Indexed as

Computer SecuritySoftwareBayes TheoremBayesian estimationcyber-physical securitydynamical systemssensors and actuators

Identifiers

PMID36015875
PMCPMC9416140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.