Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015817›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Speaker Adaptation on Articulation and Acoustics for Articulation-to-Speech Synthesis.

Beiming Cao, Alan Wisler, Jun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. 3-D Markerless Tracking of Speech Movements With Submillimeter Accuracy.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Bioinspired Artificial Intelligence Applications 2023.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. MagTrack: A Wearable Tongue Motion Tracking System for Silent Speech Interfaces.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beiming CaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1223-3146
Alan WislerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2601-2846
Jun WangDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7265-217X

Funding

Wearable silent speech technology to enhance impaired oral communicationR01DC016621 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI WANG, JUN · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016621NIH HHS R01DC016621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silent speech interfaces (SSIs) convert non-audio bio-signals, such as articulatory movement, to speech. This technology has the potential to recover the speech ability of individuals who have lost their voice but can still articulate (e.g., laryngectomees). Articulation-to-speech (ATS) synthesis is an algorithm design of SSI that has the advantages of easy-implementation and low-latency, and therefore is becoming more popular. Current ATS studies focus on speaker-dependent (SD) models to avoid large variations of articulatory patterns and acoustic features across speakers. However, these designs are limited by the small data size from individual speakers. Speaker adaptation designs that include multiple speakers' data have the potential to address the issue of limited data size from single speakers; however, few prior studies have investigated their performance in ATS. In this paper, we investigated speaker adaptation on both the input articulation and the output acoustic signals (with or without direct inclusion of data from test speakers) using the publicly available electromagnetic articulatory (EMA) dataset. We used Procrustes matching and voice conversion for articulation and voice adaptation, respectively. The performance of the ATS models was measured objectively by the mel-cepstral distortions (MCDs). The synthetic speech samples were generated and are provided in the supplementary material. The results demonstrated the improvement brought by both Procrustes matching and voice conversion on speaker-independent ATS. With the direct inclusion of target speaker data in the training process, the speaker-adaptive ATS achieved a comparable performance to speaker-dependent ATS. To our knowledge, this is the first study that has demonstrated that speaker-adaptive ATS can achieve a non-statistically different performance to speaker-dependent ATS.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionVoiceAcousticsHumansSpeechSpeech Acousticsarticulation-to-speech synthesissilent speech interfacespeaker adaptionvoice conversion

Identifiers

PMID36015817
PMCPMC9416444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.