ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Failure Detection in Quadcopter UAVs Using K-Means Clustering.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of Fault Diagnosis Methods: From Traditional Machine Learning to Large Language Model Fusion Paradigm.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Structural Vibration Analysis of UAVs Under Ground Engine Test Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Review on the State of the Art in Copter Drones and Flight Control Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Nonlinear recurrence analysis of piezo sensor placement for unmanned aerial vehicle motor failure diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prognostic and Health Management of Critical Aircraft Systems and Components: An Overview.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) failure detection system as the first step of a three-step autonomous emergency landing safety framework for UAVs. We showed the effectiveness and feasibility of using vibration data with the k-means clustering algorithm in detecting mid-flight UAV failures for that purpose. Specifically, we measured vibration signals for different faulty propeller cases during several test flights, utilizing a custom-made hardware system. After we made the vibration graphs and extracted the data, we investigated to determine the combination of acceleration and gyroscope parameters that results in the best accuracy of failure detection in quadcopter UAVs. Our investigations show that considering the gyroscope parameter in the vertical direction (gZ) along with the accelerometer parameter in the same direction (aZ) results in the highest accuracy of failure detection for the purpose of emergency landing of faulty UAVs, while ensuring a quick detection and timely engagement of the safety framework. Based on the parameter set (gZ-aZ), we then created scatter plots and confusion matrices, and applied the k-means clustering algorithm to the vibration dataset to classify the data into three health state clusters-normal, faulty, and failure. We confirm the effectiveness of the proposed system with flight experiments, in which we were able to detect faults and failures utilizing the aforementioned clusters in real time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.