Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015774›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

An Investigation of the Reliability of Different Types of Sensors in the Real-Time Vibration-Based Anomaly Inspection in Drone.

Mohamad Hazwan Mohd Ghazali, Wan Rahiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mohamad Hazwan Mohd GhazaliSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia Engineering Campus, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5306-0013
Wan RahimanSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia Engineering Campus, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-1662-7484

Funding

Collaborative Research in Engineering, Science, and Technology (CREST) 304/PELECT/6050424/C121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early drone anomaly inspection is vital to ensure the drone's safety and effectiveness. This process is often overlooked, especially by amateur drone pilots; however, some faulty conditions are difficult to notice by the naked eye or discover, even though the drone inspection process has been conducted; therefore, a real-time early drone inspection approach based on vibration data is proposed in this study. Firstly, the reliability of several microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) sensors, namely the ADXL335 accelerometer, ADXL 345 accelerometer, ADXL377 accelerometer, and SW420 vibration sensor in detecting faulty conditions, were tested and compared. The experimental results demonstrated that the vibration parameter measured using ADXL335 and ADXL345 accelerometers are the best choice as most of the faulty conditions can be detected, in contrast to other MEMS sensors. The output produced from the anomaly inspection algorithm is then converted to the "Healthy" or "Faulty" state, which is displayed in a mobile application for easy monitoring.

Indexed as

Micro-Electrical-Mechanical SystemsVibrationAlgorithmsReproducibility of ResultsUnmanned Aerial Devicesanomaly inspectiondronemobile applicationnoisesensorsvibration

Identifiers

PMID36015774
PMCPMC9413359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.