Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015744›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Hybrid Intrusion Detection Model Using EGA-PSO and Improved Random Forest Method.

Amit Kumar Balyan, Sachin Ahuja, Umesh Kumar Lilhore, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, Poongodi Manoharan, Abeer D Algarni, Hela Elmannai, Kaamran Raahemifar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amit Kumar BalyanChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Sachin AhujaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2565-6685
Umesh Kumar LilhoreKIET Group of Institutions, Delhi-NCR, Ghaziabad 201206, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6073-3773
Sanjeev Kumar SharmaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.
Poongodi ManoharanDivision of Information and Computing Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha 500001, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-6801-6138
Abeer D AlgarniDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Hela ElmannaiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-2571-1848
Kaamran RaahemifarCollege of Information Sciences and Technology, Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Program, Penn State University, State College, PA 16801, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9835-7897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the rapid growth in IT technology, digital data have increased availability, creating novel security threats that need immediate attention. An intrusion detection system (IDS) is the most promising solution for preventing malicious intrusions and tracing suspicious network behavioral patterns. Machine learning (ML) methods are widely used in IDS. Due to a limited training dataset, an ML-based IDS generates a higher false detection ratio and encounters data imbalance issues. To deal with the data-imbalance issue, this research develops an efficient hybrid network-based IDS model (HNIDS), which is utilized using the enhanced genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization(EGA-PSO) and improved random forest (IRF) methods. In the initial phase, the proposed HNIDS utilizes hybrid EGA-PSO methods to enhance the minor data samples and thus produce a balanced data set to learn the sample attributes of small samples more accurately. In the proposed HNIDS, a PSO method improves the vector. GA is enhanced by adding a multi-objective function, which selects the best features and achieves improved fitness outcomes to explore the essential features and helps minimize dimensions, enhance the true positive rate (TPR), and lower the false positive rate (FPR). In the next phase, an IRF eliminates the less significant attributes, incorporates a list of decision trees across each iterative process, supervises the classifier's performance, and prevents overfitting issues. The performance of the proposed method and existing ML methods are tested using the benchmark datasets NSL-KDD. The experimental findings demonstrated that the proposed HNIDS method achieves an accuracy of 98.979% on BCC and 88.149% on MCC for the NSL-KDD dataset, which is far better than the other ML methods i.e., SVM, RF, LR, NB, LDA, and CART.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSupport Vector MachineMachine Learninggenetic algorithmHybrid IDSintrusion detectionmachine learningparticle swarm optimizationrandom forestsecurity

Identifiers

PMID36015744
PMCPMC9414798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.