Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015563›Full record

ArticlePolymers2022

The Effect of PCL Addition on 3D-Printable PLA/HA Composite Filaments for the Treatment of Bone Defects.

Elin Åkerlund, Anna Diez-Escudero, Ana Grzeszczak, Cecilia Persson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elin ÅkerlundDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna Diez-EscuderoOrtholab, Department of Surgical Sciences, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4686-9564
Ana GrzeszczakDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9417-4631
Cecilia PerssonDivision of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ångström Laboratory, Uppsala University, 752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6663-6536
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

Göran Gustafsson Foundation 1729Lars Hierta Memorial Foundation FO2018-0240VINNOVA 2019-00029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The still-growing field of additive manufacturing (AM), which includes 3D printing, has enabled manufacturing of patient-specific medical devices with high geometrical accuracy in a relatively quick manner. However, the development of materials with specific properties is still ongoing, including those for enhanced bone-repair applications. Such applications seek materials with tailored mechanical properties close to bone tissue and, importantly, that can serve as temporary supports, allowing for new bone ingrowth while the material is resorbed. Thus, controlling the resorption rate of materials for bone applications can support bone healing by balancing new tissue formation and implant resorption. In this regard, this work aimed to study the combination of polylactic acid (PLA), polycaprolactone (PCL) and hydroxyapatite (HA) to develop customized biocompatible and bioresorbable polymer-based composite filaments, through extrusion, for fused filament fabrication (FFF) printing. PLA and PCL were used as supporting polymer matrices while HA was added to enhance the biological activity. The materials were characterized in terms of mechanical properties, thermal stability, chemical composition and morphology. An accelerated degradation study was executed to investigate the impact of degradation on the above-mentioned properties. The results showed that the materials' chemical compositions were not affected by the extrusion nor the printing process. All materials exhibited higher mechanical properties than human trabecular bone, even after degradation with a mass loss of around 30% for the polymer blends and 60% for the composites. It was also apparent that the mineral accelerated the polymer degradation significantly, which can be advantageous for a faster healing time, where support is required only for a shorter time period.

Indexed as

3D printingaccelerated degradation studybiodegradablefused deposition modelling (FDM)fused filament fabrication (FFF)hydroxyapatitemechanical propertiespolycaprolactone (PCL)polylactic acid (PLA)

Identifiers

PMID36015563
PMCPMC9416491
OpenAlexW4291513202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.