Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015419›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Preliminary Study on Growth and Yield Potential of Ten Elite Lines of Quinoa (

Ariba Asif, Shahbaz Khan, Bareera Asif, Danish Ibrar, Zuhair Hasnain, Muhammad Shoaib Ismail, Muhammad Rizwan, Sami Ullah, Saqib Bashir, Afroz Rais and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Ariba AsifDepartment of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan.
Shahbaz KhanNational Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad 45500, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4524-9630
Bareera AsifDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Islamia University Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Pakistan.
Danish IbrarNational Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad 45500, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-9505-1155
Zuhair HasnainDepartment of Agronomy, PMA-Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7089-5784
Muhammad Shoaib IsmailDepartment of Agronomy, MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan 64200, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4992-3733
Muhammad RizwanDepartment of Agronomy, MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan 64200, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7046-2890
Sami UllahDepartment of Agronomy, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan 29220, Pakistan.
Saqib BashirDepartment of Soil & Environmental Science, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan 32200, Pakistan.
Afroz RaisDepartment of Botany, Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University, Quetta 08763, Pakistan.
Sohail IrshadDepartment of Agronomy, MNS-University of Agriculture, Multan 64200, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0592-5032
Tasawer AbbasInservice Agriculture Training Institute, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Naila FarooqDepartment of Soil & Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan.
Jawaher AlkahtaniDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed S ElshikhDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6710-0458
Muhammad Nawaz Shareef University of Agriculture · PKKing Saud University · SAPakistan Agricultural Research Council · PKUniversity of Sargodha · PKGhazi University · PKGomal University · PKIslamia University of Bahawalpur · PKPir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University · PKSardar Bahadur Khan Women's University · PKUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimization of agronomic practices for cultivation of quinoa, a super food and climate resilient crop, is critical to obtain its maximum grain yield under the current scenario of climate change. In the present experimentation, we evaluated the appropriate sowing time of ten elite lines of quinoa, already screened from USDA germplasm. Seeds of each line were sown in the experimental area at Square No. 22, Block No. 5, Directorate of Farm, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan on 15 November, 30 November and 15 December during quinoa cultivation season of 2019-2020. Sowing time significantly affected the emergence percentage, days taken to anthesis, chlorophyll contents, sodium and potassium concentrations in leaf, plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves and leaf area, panicle length, grain yield and 1000-grain weight. Lines; PIA-922, PIA-924, PIA-928 and PIA-929 performed better under first sowing and produced higher grain yield as compared to other lines. Similarly, PIA-921, PIA-922, PIA-925 and PIA-932 produced maximum biomass and grain yield under second sowing date while in case of third sowing date, PIA-926, PIA-928, PIA-930 and PIA-931 were observed more responsive regarding growth and yield attributes. A diversified pattern of agronomic, growth and yield contributing attributes of quinoa lines was observed when cultivated under varying sowing dates. The collected data will be very informative for the breeders and agronomists during selection and variety development process in future.

Indexed as

germplasmgrowthquinoasowing datesyield

Identifiers

PMID36015419
PMCPMC9413402
OpenAlexW4291513119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.