Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015315›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2022

Structural and Functional Analysis of Excised Skins and Human Reconstructed Epidermis with Confocal Raman Spectroscopy and in Microfluidic Diffusion Chambers.

Dorottya Kocsis, Hichem Kichou, Katalin Döme, Zsófia Varga-Medveczky, Zsolt Révész, Istvan Antal, Franciska Erdő

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Surface Characterization of Skin Substitute Materials.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorottya KocsisFaculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-7908-3248
Hichem KichouEA 6295 Nanomédicaments et NanoSondes (NMNS) Laboratory, University of Tours, 37000 Tours, France.
Katalin DömeDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Semmelweis University, H-1092 Budapest, Hungary.
Zsófia Varga-MedveczkyFaculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt RévészRévész Plasztika, H-1125 Budapest, Hungary.
Istvan AntalDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Semmelweis University, H-1092 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5434-201X
Franciska ErdőFaculty of Information Technology and Bionics, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, H-1083 Budapest, Hungary.
Pázmány Péter Catholic University · HUSemmelweis University · HUUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund of Hungary, financed under the National Bionics Program TKP2021-EGA-42the Conseil Régional Centre-Val de Loire (project MINIONs, ARD Cosmetosciences N° 2020-00141275 and APR-IR-project UFO N°2020-00138875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several ex vivo and in vitro skin models are available in the toolbox of dermatological and cosmetic research. Some of them are widely used in drug penetration testing. The excised skins show higher variability, while the in vitro skins provide more reproducible data. The aim of the current study was to compare the chemical composition of different skin models (excised rat skin, excised human skin and human-reconstructed epidermis) by measurement of ceramides, cholesterol, lactate, urea, protein and water at different depths of the tissues. The second goal was to compile a testing system, which includes a skin-on-a-chip diffusion setup and a confocal Raman spectroscopy for testing drug diffusion across the skin barrier and accumulation in the tissue models. A hydrophilic drug caffeine and the P-glycoprotein substrate quinidine were used in the study as topical cream formulations. The results indicate that although the transdermal diffusion of quinidine is lower, the skin accumulation was comparable for the two drugs. The various skin models showed different chemical compositions. The human skin was abundant in ceramides and cholesterol, while the reconstructed skin contained less water and more urea and protein. Based on these results, it can be concluded that skin-on-a-chip and confocal Raman microspectroscopy are suitable for testing drug penetration and distribution at different skin layers within an exposition window. Furthermore, obese human skin should be treated with caution for skin absorption testing due to its unbalanced composition.

Indexed as

confocal Raman spectroscopyhuman-reconstructed epidermishydrationskin barrierskin-on-a-chip microfluidic deviceskin penetrationtransdermal deliverytransepidermal water loss

Identifiers

PMID36015315
PMCPMC9415586
OpenAlexW4291892050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.