ArticlePharmaceutics2022
Imatinib Optimized Therapy Improves Major Molecular Response Rates in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02896842 (A Prospective Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating the Monitoring of Imatinib Mesylate), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating the Monitoring of Imatinib Mesylate (Glivec®) Plasmatic Through Level in Patients Newly Diagnosed With Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukaemia (CP-CML).
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Target Attainment and Clinical and Biochemical Parameters Associated with the Pharmacokinetics of 12 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Optimizing imatinib sampling strategies through a population approach: a crucial step to model-informed precision dosing validation for point-of-care therapeutic drug monitoring.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Oral TKIs and PARP Inhibitors: A Practical Framework for Clinical Implementation.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Review
- Simulation of Imatinib Pharmacokinetics in pregnant women with chronic myeloid leukemia in the third trimester.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Exploiting tumor lineage features for precision cancer therapy.Trends in cancer · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Oral Targeted Anticancer Drugs: Achievements, Experiences, Challenges, and the Path Forward.Therapeutic drug monitoring · 2025Review
- [How I treat pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Review
- Review
- Body mass index affects imatinib exposure: Real-world evidence from TDM with adaptive dosing.Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2025Article
- Biopharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic attributes to drive nanoformulations of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2024Review
- Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2024Article
- Constitutional DNA Polymorphisms Associated with the Plasma Imatinib Concentration in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The registered dose for imatinib is 400 mg/d, despite high inter-patient variability in imatinib plasmatic exposure. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is routinely used to maximize a drug’s efficacy or tolerance. We decided to conduct a prospective randomized trial (OPTIM-imatinib trial) to assess the value of TDM in patients with chronic phase chronic myelogenous treated with imatinib as first-line therapy (NCT02896842). Eligible patients started imatinib at 400 mg daily, followed by imatinib [C]min assessment. Patients considered underdosed ([C]min < 1000 ng/mL) were randomized in a dose-increase strategy aiming to reach the threshold of 1000 ng/mL (TDM arm) versus standard imatinib management (control arm). Patients with [C]min levels ≥ 1000 ng/mL were treated following current European Leukemia Net recommendations (observational arm). The primary endpoint was the rate of major molecular response (MMR, BCR::ABL1IS ≤ 0.1%) at 12 months. Out of 133 evaluable patients on imatinib 400 mg daily, 86 patients had a [C]min < 1000 ng/mL and were randomized. The TDM strategy resulted in a significant increase in [C]min values with a mean imatinib daily dose of 603 mg daily. Patients included in the TDM arm had a 12-month MMR rate of 67% (95% CI, 51−81) compared to 39% (95% CI, 24−55) for the control arm (p = 0.017). This early advantage persisted over the 3-year study period, in which we considered imatinib cessation as a censoring event. Imatinib TDM was feasible and significantly improved the 12-month MMR rate. This early advantage may be beneficial for patients without easy access to second-line TKIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.