Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015300›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ivacaftor, Lumacaftor, Tezacaftor, and Elexacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis: Where Are We Now?

Eva Choong, Alain Sauty, Angela Koutsokera, Sylvain Blanchon, Pascal André, Laurent Decosterd

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eva ChoongService and Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6776-4978
Alain SautyService of Pulmonology, Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Pourtalès Hospital, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Angela KoutsokeraUnit of Adult Cystic Fibrosis Unit and CFTR-Related Disorders, Division of Pulmonology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1227-1679
Sylvain BlanchonService of Pediatrics, Pediatric Pulmonology and Cystic Fibrosis Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pascal AndréService and Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Laurent DecosterdService and Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHHospital Neuchâtel · CH

Funding

Cystic Fibrosis Switzerland 2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drugs modulating the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, namely ivacaftor, lumacaftor, tezacaftor, and elexacaftor, are currently revolutionizing the management of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), particularly those with at least one

Indexed as

caftorCFTR modulatorscystic fibrosisdose–effect relationshipelexacaftorivacaftorLC–MS/MSlumacaftorPK/PDplasma levelTDMtezacaftortherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36015300
PMCPMC9412421
OpenAlexW4290999303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.