Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015297›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2022

Protein-Based Adjuvants for Vaccines as Immunomodulators of the Innate and Adaptive Immune Response: Current Knowledge, Challenges, and Future Opportunities.

Diego A Díaz-Dinamarca, Michelle L Salazar, Byron N Castillo, Augusto Manubens, Abel E Vasquez, Fabián Salazar, María Inés Becker

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A large language model for predicting neurotoxic peptides and neurotoxins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. AgainstToxins · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Human genetics of responses to vaccines.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diego A Díaz-DinamarcaFundación Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (FUCITED), Santiago 7750000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-5677-920X
Michelle L SalazarFundación Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (FUCITED), Santiago 7750000, Chile.
Byron N CastilloFundación Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (FUCITED), Santiago 7750000, Chile.
Augusto ManubensFundación Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (FUCITED), Santiago 7750000, Chile.
Abel E VasquezSección de Biotecnología, Departamento Agencia Nacional de Dispositivos Médicos, Innovación y Desarrollo, Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile, Santiago 7750000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-7346-9043
Fabián SalazarFundación Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (FUCITED), Santiago 7750000, Chile.
María Inés BeckerFundación Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo (FUCITED), Santiago 7750000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-9711-2222
Fundación Chile · CLSan Sebastián University · CL

Funding

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (FONDECYT) 1201600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New-generation vaccines, formulated with subunits or nucleic acids, are less immunogenic than classical vaccines formulated with live-attenuated or inactivated pathogens. This difference has led to an intensified search for additional potent vaccine adjuvants that meet safety and efficacy criteria and confer long-term protection. This review provides an overview of protein-based adjuvants (PBAs) obtained from different organisms, including bacteria, mollusks, plants, and humans. Notably, despite structural differences, all PBAs show significant immunostimulatory properties, eliciting B-cell- and T-cell-mediated immune responses to administered antigens, providing advantages over many currently adopted adjuvant approaches. Furthermore, PBAs are natural biocompatible and biodegradable substances that induce minimal reactogenicity and toxicity and interact with innate immune receptors, enhancing their endocytosis and modulating subsequent adaptive immune responses. We propose that PBAs can contribute to the development of vaccines against complex pathogens, including intracellular pathogens such as

Indexed as

adaptive immune responseadjuvantsC-type lectin receptorsinnate immune responseprotein-based adjuvantsproteinsToll-like receptorsvaccines

Identifiers

PMID36015297
PMCPMC9414397
OpenAlexW4290999275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.