Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015104›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Efficacy and Safety of Trametinib in Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Associated Plexiform Neurofibroma and Low-Grade Glioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dun Wang, Lingling Ge, Zizhen Guo, Yuehua Li, Beiyao Zhu, Wei Wang, Chengjiang Wei, Qingfeng Li, Zhichao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dun WangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Lingling GeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Zizhen GuoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Yuehua LiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Beiyao ZhuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6443-5586
Wei WangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Chengjiang WeiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Qingfeng LiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7822-618X
Zhichao WangDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5859-4193
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

"Chenguang Program" supported by Shanghai Education Development Foundation (SHEDF) 19CG18Innovative research team of high-level local universities in Shanghai SSMU-ZDCX20180700National Natural Science Foundation of China 82102344; 82172228Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 22ZR1422300Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 19JC1413Shanghai Municipal Key Clinical Specialty shslczdzk00901Shanghai Rising Star Program supported by Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 20QA1405600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trametinib has been used in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients, especially those with unresectable nerve tumors, but no systematic review based on the latest studies has been published. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of trametinib in treating NF1-related nerve tumors. Original articles reporting the efficacy and safety of trametinib in NF1 patents were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to 1 June 2022. Using R software and the 'meta' package, the objective response rates (ORRs) and disease control rates (DCRs) were calculated to evaluate the efficacy, and the pooled proportion of adverse events (AEs) was calculated. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence. Eight studies involving 92 patients were included, which had a very low to moderate quality of evidence. The pooled ORR was 45.3% (95% CI: 28.9-62.1%, I

Indexed as

low-grade Gliomameta-analysisneurofibromatosis type 1plexiform neurofibromasystematic reviewtrametinib

Identifiers

PMID36015104
PMCPMC9415905
OpenAlexW4289203593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.