Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36015051›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022

An Investigation of the Effect of Water Additives on Broiler Growth and the Caecal Microbiota at Harvest.

Genevieve Greene, Leonard Koolman, Paul Whyte, Catherine M Burgess, Helen Lynch, Aidan Coffey, Brigid Lucey, Lisa O'Connor, Declan Bolton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Genevieve GreeneTeagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, D15 DY05 Dublin, Ireland.
Leonard KoolmanTeagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, D15 DY05 Dublin, Ireland.
Paul WhyteSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
Catherine M BurgessTeagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, D15 DY05 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3722-5935
Helen LynchSchool of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
Aidan CoffeyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Munster Technological University, T12 P928 Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4116-9913
Brigid LuceyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Munster Technological University, T12 P928 Cork, Ireland.
Lisa O'ConnorFood Safety Authority of Ireland, George's Dock, Dublin 1, D01 P2V6 Dublin, Ireland.
Declan BoltonTeagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin 15, D15 DY05 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9037-1432
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IEUniversity College Dublin · IEMunster Technological University · IEFood Safety Authority of Ireland · IE

Funding

Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland 15F641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Campylobacter is the most common foodborne pathogen in developed countries and most cases are associated with poultry. This study investigated the effect of three anti-Campylobacter water additives on broiler growth and on the caecal microbiota at harvest using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Mixtures of organic acids (OA) and essential oils (EO) were administered to broilers for the entirety of the production cycle (35 d) and medium-chain fatty acids (MCFA) for 5 d immediately before harvest, under commercial conditions. Bird weight gain was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced in broilers receiving the OA and EO treatments. While this was most likely due to reduced water intake and corresponding lower feed consumption, changes to the caecal microbiota may also have contributed. Firmicutes made up over 75% of the bacteria regardless of sample type, while the minor phyla included Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Melainabacteria, and Proteobacteria. There were no significant (p > 0.05) differences in the alpha diversity as measured using ACE, Chao1, and Shannon indices, except for control (water) versus MCFA and OA versus MCFA, using the Wilcox test. In contrast, there was a significant (p < 0.05) difference in beta diversity when the treated were compared to the untreated control and main flock samples, while linear discriminant analysis effect size (LeFSe) identified three OTUs that were present in the control but absent in the treated birds. It was concluded that the water additives tested adversely affected broiler performance, which may, at least in part, be due to changes in the caecal microbiota, assuming that the altered microbiota at day 35 is indicative of a change throughout the production cycle.

Indexed as

broilerbroiler performancecaecal microbiotaessential oilsmedium-chain fatty acidsorganic acidswater additives

Identifiers

PMID36015051
PMCPMC9412471
OpenAlexW4293221197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.